From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Florent Revest <revest@google.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 bpf-next 4/9] ftrace: Add update_ftrace_direct_add function
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 20:39:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251217203909.474ae959@robin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251215211402.353056-5-jolsa@kernel.org>
On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 22:13:57 +0100
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
> +/**
> + * hash_add - adds two struct ftrace_hash and returns the result
> + * @a: struct ftrace_hash object
> + * @b: struct ftrace_hash object
> + *
> + * Returns struct ftrace_hash object on success, NULL on error.
> + */
> +static struct ftrace_hash *hash_add(struct ftrace_hash *a, struct ftrace_hash *b)
> +{
> + struct ftrace_func_entry *entry;
> + struct ftrace_hash *add;
> + int size, i;
> +
> + size = hash_count(a) + hash_count(b);
> + if (size > 32)
> + size = 32;
> +
> + add = alloc_and_copy_ftrace_hash(fls(size), a);
> + if (!add)
> + goto error;
You can just return NULL here, as add is NULL.
> +
> + size = 1 << b->size_bits;
> + for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> + hlist_for_each_entry(entry, &b->buckets[i], hlist) {
> + if (add_hash_entry_direct(add, entry->ip, entry->direct) == NULL)
> + goto error;
Could remove the error and have:
if (add_hash_entry_direct(add, entry->ip, entry->direct) == NULL) {
free_ftrace_hash(add);
return NULL;
}
> + }
> + }
> + return add;
> +
> + error:
> + free_ftrace_hash(add);
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
Non static functions require a kerneldoc header.
> +int update_ftrace_direct_add(struct ftrace_ops *ops, struct ftrace_hash *hash)
> +{
> + struct ftrace_hash *old_direct_functions = NULL, *new_direct_functions;
> + struct ftrace_hash *old_filter_hash, *new_filter_hash = NULL;
BTW, I prefer to not double up on variables. That is to have each on
their own lines. Makes it easier to read for me.
> + struct ftrace_func_entry *entry;
> + int i, size, err = -EINVAL;
Even here.
> + bool reg;
> +
> + if (!hash_count(hash))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&direct_mutex);
> +
> + /* Make sure requested entries are not already registered. */
> + size = 1 << hash->size_bits;
> + for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
If you want, you can remove the i declaration and use for(int i = 0; ... here.
> + hlist_for_each_entry(entry, &hash->buckets[i], hlist) {
> + if (__ftrace_lookup_ip(direct_functions, entry->ip))
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + old_filter_hash = ops->func_hash ? ops->func_hash->filter_hash : NULL;
> +
> + /* If there's nothing in filter_hash we need to register the ops. */
> + reg = hash_count(old_filter_hash) == 0;
> + if (reg) {
> + if (ops->func || ops->trampoline)
> + goto out_unlock;
> + if (ops->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_ENABLED)
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + new_filter_hash = hash_add(old_filter_hash, hash);
> + if (!new_filter_hash)
> + goto out_unlock;
> +
> + new_direct_functions = hash_add(direct_functions, hash);
> + if (!new_direct_functions)
> + goto out_unlock;
> +
> + old_direct_functions = direct_functions;
> + rcu_assign_pointer(direct_functions, new_direct_functions);
> +
> + if (reg) {
> + ops->func = call_direct_funcs;
> + ops->flags |= MULTI_FLAGS;
> + ops->trampoline = FTRACE_REGS_ADDR;
> + ops->local_hash.filter_hash = new_filter_hash;
> +
> + err = register_ftrace_function_nolock(ops);
> + if (err) {
> + /* restore old filter on error */
> + ops->local_hash.filter_hash = old_filter_hash;
> +
> + /* cleanup for possible another register call */
> + ops->func = NULL;
> + ops->trampoline = 0;
> + } else {
> + new_filter_hash = old_filter_hash;
> + }
> + } else {
> + err = ftrace_update_ops(ops, new_filter_hash, EMPTY_HASH);
> + /*
> + * new_filter_hash is dup-ed, so we need to release it anyway,
> + * old_filter_hash either stays on error or is already released
> + */
> + }
> +
> + if (err) {
> + /* reset direct_functions and free the new one */
> + rcu_assign_pointer(direct_functions, old_direct_functions);
> + old_direct_functions = new_direct_functions;
> + }
> +
> + out_unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&direct_mutex);
> +
> + if (old_direct_functions && old_direct_functions != EMPTY_HASH)
> + call_rcu_tasks(&old_direct_functions->rcu, register_ftrace_direct_cb);
> + if (new_filter_hash)
free_ftrace_hash() checks for NULL, so you don't need the above if statement.
> + free_ftrace_hash(new_filter_hash);
> +
> + return err;
-- Steve
> +}
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS */
>
> /**
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-18 1:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-15 21:13 [PATCHv5 bpf-next 0/9] ftrace,bpf: Use single direct ops for bpf trampolines Jiri Olsa
2025-12-15 21:13 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 1/9] ftrace,bpf: Remove FTRACE_OPS_FL_JMP ftrace_ops flag Jiri Olsa
2025-12-15 21:31 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-12-16 1:27 ` Menglong Dong
2025-12-17 8:40 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-12-15 21:13 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 2/9] ftrace: Make alloc_and_copy_ftrace_hash direct friendly Jiri Olsa
2025-12-15 21:13 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 3/9] ftrace: Export some of hash related functions Jiri Olsa
2025-12-18 1:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-12-19 9:27 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-12-15 21:13 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 4/9] ftrace: Add update_ftrace_direct_add function Jiri Olsa
2025-12-18 1:39 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2025-12-19 9:27 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-12-15 21:13 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 5/9] ftrace: Add update_ftrace_direct_del function Jiri Olsa
2025-12-18 1:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-12-19 9:27 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-12-15 21:13 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 6/9] ftrace: Add update_ftrace_direct_mod function Jiri Olsa
2025-12-18 15:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-12-18 15:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-12-19 9:27 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-12-15 21:14 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 7/9] bpf: Add trampoline ip hash table Jiri Olsa
2025-12-15 21:14 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 8/9] ftrace: Factor ftrace_ops ops_func interface Jiri Olsa
2025-12-18 16:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-12-15 21:14 ` [PATCHv5 bpf-next 9/9] bpf,x86: Use single ftrace_ops for direct calls Jiri Olsa
2025-12-18 16:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-12-19 9:27 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-12-28 15:22 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-12-29 16:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-12-20 19:38 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-21 11:09 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251217203909.474ae959@robin \
--to=rostedt@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=revest@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).