From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EB5E32E131; Mon, 29 Dec 2025 16:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767024219; cv=none; b=k6QwDeTndUgZbEzaiaaMTzPvLPfYtb3YSujumb7V856eqoWiOGG3Tin5mKC4IqPfRO0gOfcS2vL4aQ21FM+x2LeTJHu9PuPzJwL/fwXHgSvuKcEMsVP7+aWRBaCYMJv7yCi3rLME2KFx+6mRsqZQp/jIbvTxJ9r+qbnBX6P4tnw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767024219; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HmUgq1yr7Ldrp6As2Z2B3JdatI+KSxe5tvhmxvD24NQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BQ0dOk2fTH+OnYnKHMxjXY1mQfgJFUssiQAznpzhKWO74ZApljRKthZ4CNj5IKevkwl2VuwBpJysxxM7l4UfmaZZrMzYiW49ktw4RagxUtXjvhERyD+b8yjGZrxq8nW4W20IdIId1ylmg3+3esXUXETjmzYoyKU6BeyqosanoUg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org Received: from omf06.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCD31401C3; Mon, 29 Dec 2025 16:03:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: rostedt@goodmis.org) by omf06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5275D2000F; Mon, 29 Dec 2025 16:03:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 11:03:37 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Steven Rostedt , Florent Revest , Mark Rutland , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Menglong Dong , Song Liu Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 bpf-next 9/9] bpf,x86: Use single ftrace_ops for direct calls Message-ID: <20251229110337.030232e0@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20251215211402.353056-1-jolsa@kernel.org> <20251215211402.353056-10-jolsa@kernel.org> <20251218112608.11a14a4a@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.20.0git84 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Stat-Signature: wk4rtw6rr6g4p4h5uhrzm8w5hsw49mbm X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5275D2000F X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX1+B2wF6tKeYH5GnSEs+kzFmQoFDKLjrxgk= X-HE-Tag: 1767024212-326374 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX1/bW0jhkTC4A5lBxmoz7injUkXEiRwc49PHTrEtedO+o2+EF7kEIX13OfCkWR8cfC/wf6yKI/Q0NQDlTnSJsNmpf4yT0wpVV+N4nepWY5mkqko6TEbEej1Hr/XBJOTUmUhLNAw+F8Po9cqWSf80LUhYgReNteLIHYoT3xCo0TXT+IvZW0BFzVvJMpeRVZg0aujEtfTujLBdfwJ6gs/3VmkTqwGCQMfW0cPRs+W71KOxMC0xTVONhn/fO58DXW07r0HY13AiCiGRLvic7zoMOT1W6fEzioF/e36A4d8P1U4RXDcCu+d2MOGF7nIBtPhn3X26ymHlZZaJMYNK8sq9I5FMZaPIESRM/MU5RtaPB+ULqw== On Sun, 28 Dec 2025 16:22:18 +0100 Jiri Olsa wrote: > actualy, it seems that having it the original way with adding the rest > of the wrappers for !CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS case is > easier AFAICS I'm fine either way. -- Steve