From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CFCE2E62C0; Mon, 26 Jan 2026 21:37:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769463476; cv=none; b=ncu/gwB0Kaen+asR+n7Upk3Q5GpTo6IbUFoNTwlIubkl8RA7LtyfKWL8bTDgyr9hWzrJt+MT6vz0MN+VL3JpEF4R9rs2bdXRnPZ9Xx24Sc0sMyAh06fyCBDrQnJY5PpVCzt3df8NTTbKw83eGK9HpUxtueEclt0jl9gVHiOTAI8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769463476; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Bi+BbTjZF7dffgqlDsGev8VQcqOcP5ksA+yWlGZ6/TI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bre3nwqCTEMw+zHKNr5//OEPZIv9qbVQBqyc7C2ve2j6iPF7xWOfzt0X/k7H5X8w59kdwnfJWutxpeHLOMIHul+p8PhDsXsHz3BOzDazdgLru3R5QWhFrP9iBbw6MEyaDs++ramzVKqjLD+ywlBy0MycvHBpqaTZmI7ZNR4Ys1E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=dn9XPR4P; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="dn9XPR4P" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=l2f2L/7BRQC+PvxoygrLgGLz/fDzYKu++Aa72y9T504=; b=dn9XPR4PG22BS8I6YTfOhD1RIo y9f9OWyrhf3V7ymJz+vQqwHk+Rt4O9aitXKIHiwMFzMNlqxljIEMgwqr4UNh85TB8skX6gdVoaBtS QJooBAJxCmBGgpLqWZ8SRcpgKPMWcq2vYSF/6AQNocng/U2nFpszhzhnyB77NtZEvDqwIp46/8K3h r1PObyQPYmY1RLCMtTlS6VJQtcX3/K+BXHVEnOtmYJeP0kDTjdl/kv9PE2Bxg1wtBU8iVhS3Zv3d/ sow58KOaAnSt8TgzLQ9DfoLyb00XARMsPEH49PXL8TA8pCP2zB3V4UcHoA6FQ4DbYtB/sRvV1R9Rc 5tdEkXDw==; Received: from 2001-1c00-8d85-5700-266e-96ff-fe07-7dcc.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl ([2001:1c00:8d85:5700:266e:96ff:fe07:7dcc] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vkUHM-00000005u9f-3Zca; Mon, 26 Jan 2026 21:37:49 +0000 Received: by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 675F0300756; Mon, 26 Jan 2026 22:37:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 22:37:48 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Alice Ryhl Cc: Steven Rostedt , Miguel Ojeda , Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , Josh Poimboeuf , Jason Baron , Ard Biesheuvel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add Rust files to STATIC BRANCH/CALL and TRACING Message-ID: <20260126213748.GR171111@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20260107-jump-label-rust-maintainers-v1-1-702b03482f2e@google.com> <20260112100006.7db6d31d@gandalf.local.home> <20260112115408.48ed4d35@gandalf.local.home> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 12:27:10PM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 11:54:08AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 15:10:31 +0000 > > Alice Ryhl wrote: > > > > > > And have the M of the other sections be R here? > > > > > > Sure, we can do that. > > > > > > Are you still willing to pick up the patches? I think that is simpler in > > > case there are any series that touch both the C and Rust parts. (Such as > > > the initial tracepoint series did.) > > > > Yes. So I guess you can still add me with a 'M:'. But I wanted a separate > > section so that all the Rust expertise is still included. > > What about the STATIC BRANCH/CALL subsystem? Should I also leave you or > someone else as 'M:' there? It's unclear to me who usually picks up > patches for STATIC BRANCH/CALL when they are not a dependency to a patch > for somewhere else. I think that'd be me -- I typically do the static branch/call bits.