From: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@oracle.com>,
"Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@gnu.org>,
Beau Belgrave <beaub@linux.microsoft.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
"Carlos O'Donell" <codonell@redhat.com>,
Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>, Dylan Hatch <dylanbhatch@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 07/12] s390/ptrace: Convert function macros to inline functions
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 16:19:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260127151926.2805123-8-jremus@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260127151926.2805123-1-jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Convert the function macros user_mode(), instruction_pointer(), and
user_stack_pointer() to inline functions, to align their definition
with x86 and arm64.
Use const qualifier on struct pt_regs pointer parameters to prevent
compiler warnings:
arch/s390/kernel/stacktrace.c: In function ‘arch_stack_walk_user_common’:
arch/s390/kernel/stacktrace.c:114:34: warning: passing argument 1 of
‘instruction_pointer’ discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target
type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
...
arch/s390/kernel/stacktrace.c:117:48: warning: passing argument 1 of
‘user_stack_pointer’ discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target
type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
...
While at it add const qualifier to all struct pt_regs pointer parameters
that are accessed read-only and use __always_inline instead of inline to
harmonize the helper functions.
[hca@linux.ibm.com: Use psw_bits() helper]
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
---
Notes (jremus):
Changes in v4:
- New patch. Split out "while at it" changes from patch "s390/ptrace:
Provide frame_pointer()" to go upstream separately. (Heiko)
arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h
index 962cf042c66d..e6ec0ccf3d73 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/ptrace.h
@@ -214,16 +214,23 @@ void update_cr_regs(struct task_struct *task);
#define arch_has_single_step() (1)
#define arch_has_block_step() (1)
-#define user_mode(regs) (((regs)->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) != 0)
-#define instruction_pointer(regs) ((regs)->psw.addr)
-#define user_stack_pointer(regs)((regs)->gprs[15])
#define profile_pc(regs) instruction_pointer(regs)
-static inline long regs_return_value(struct pt_regs *regs)
+static __always_inline bool user_mode(const struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ return psw_bits(regs->psw).pstate;
+}
+
+static inline long regs_return_value(const struct pt_regs *regs)
{
return regs->gprs[2];
}
+static __always_inline unsigned long instruction_pointer(const struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ return regs->psw.addr;
+}
+
static inline void instruction_pointer_set(struct pt_regs *regs,
unsigned long val)
{
@@ -233,19 +240,26 @@ static inline void instruction_pointer_set(struct pt_regs *regs,
int regs_query_register_offset(const char *name);
const char *regs_query_register_name(unsigned int offset);
-static __always_inline unsigned long kernel_stack_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
+static __always_inline unsigned long kernel_stack_pointer(const struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ return regs->gprs[15];
+}
+
+static __always_inline unsigned long user_stack_pointer(const struct pt_regs *regs)
{
return regs->gprs[15];
}
-static __always_inline unsigned long regs_get_register(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int offset)
+static __always_inline unsigned long regs_get_register(const struct pt_regs *regs,
+ unsigned int offset)
{
if (offset >= NUM_GPRS)
return 0;
return regs->gprs[offset];
}
-static __always_inline int regs_within_kernel_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long addr)
+static __always_inline int regs_within_kernel_stack(const struct pt_regs *regs,
+ unsigned long addr)
{
unsigned long ksp = kernel_stack_pointer(regs);
@@ -261,7 +275,8 @@ static __always_inline int regs_within_kernel_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, unsign
* is specifined by @regs. If the @n th entry is NOT in the kernel stack,
* this returns 0.
*/
-static __always_inline unsigned long regs_get_kernel_stack_nth(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int n)
+static __always_inline unsigned long regs_get_kernel_stack_nth(const struct pt_regs *regs,
+ unsigned int n)
{
unsigned long addr;
@@ -278,8 +293,8 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long regs_get_kernel_stack_nth(struct pt_regs *r
*
* regs_get_kernel_argument() returns @n th argument of the function call.
*/
-static inline unsigned long regs_get_kernel_argument(struct pt_regs *regs,
- unsigned int n)
+static __always_inline unsigned long regs_get_kernel_argument(const struct pt_regs *regs,
+ unsigned int n)
{
unsigned int argoffset = STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD / sizeof(long);
@@ -290,7 +305,7 @@ static inline unsigned long regs_get_kernel_argument(struct pt_regs *regs,
return regs_get_kernel_stack_nth(regs, argoffset + n);
}
-static inline void regs_set_return_value(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long rc)
+static __always_inline void regs_set_return_value(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long rc)
{
regs->gprs[2] = rc;
}
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-27 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-27 15:19 [PATCH v4 00/12] s390: SFrame user space unwinding Jens Remus
2026-01-27 15:19 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] s390: asm/dwarf.h should only be included in assembly files Jens Remus
2026-01-27 15:19 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] s390/vdso: Avoid emitting DWARF CFI for non-vDSO Jens Remus
2026-01-27 15:19 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] s390/vdso: Keep function symbols in vDSO Jens Remus
2026-01-27 15:19 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] s390/vdso: Enable SFrame V3 generation " Jens Remus
2026-01-27 15:19 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] unwind_user: Enable archs that define CFA = SP_callsite + offset Jens Remus
2026-01-27 15:19 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] unwind_user/sframe: Enable archs with encoded SFrame CFA offsets Jens Remus
2026-01-27 15:19 ` Jens Remus [this message]
2026-01-27 15:19 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] s390/ptrace: Provide frame_pointer() Jens Remus
2026-01-27 15:19 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] s390/unwind_user/sframe: Enable sframe unwinding on s390 Jens Remus
2026-01-27 15:19 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] unwind_user: Introduce FP/RA recovery rule unknown Jens Remus
2026-01-27 15:19 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] unwind_user/fp: Use arch-specific helper to initialize FP frame Jens Remus
2026-01-27 15:19 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] s390/unwind_user/fp: Enable back chain unwinding of user space Jens Remus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260127151926.2805123-8-jremus@linux.ibm.com \
--to=jremus@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=beaub@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=codonell@redhat.com \
--cc=dylanbhatch@google.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=indu.bhagat@oracle.com \
--cc=jemarch@gnu.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@kernel.org \
--cc=sam@gentoo.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox