From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] uprobes: fix incorrect lockdep condition in filter_chain()
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 10:16:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260128-uprobe_rcu-v2-1-994ea6d32730@debian.org> (raw)
The list_for_each_entry_rcu() in filter_chain() uses
rcu_read_lock_trace_held() as the lockdep condition, but the function
holds consumer_rwsem, not the RCU trace lock.
This gives me the following output when running with some locking debug
option enabled:
kernel/events/uprobes.c:1141 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
filter_chain
register_for_each_vma
uprobe_unregister_nosync
__probe_event_disable
Remove the incorrect lockdep condition since the rwsem provides
sufficient protection for the list traversal.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: cc01bd044e6a ("uprobes: travers uprobe's consumer list locklessly under SRCU protection")
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- updated the "fixes" tag (Oleg)
- Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260128-uprobe_rcu-v1-1-d41316763799@debian.org
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index d546d32390a81..726d13b375f3d 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@ static bool filter_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm)
bool ret = false;
down_read(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem);
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(uc, &uprobe->consumers, cons_node, rcu_read_lock_trace_held()) {
+ list_for_each_entry(uc, &uprobe->consumers, cons_node) {
ret = consumer_filter(uc, mm);
if (ret)
break;
---
base-commit: 1f97d9dcf53649c41c33227b345a36902cbb08ad
change-id: 20260128-uprobe_rcu-e21867ab4c1b
Best regards,
--
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
next reply other threads:[~2026-01-28 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-28 18:16 Breno Leitao [this message]
2026-01-28 22:29 ` [PATCH v2] uprobes: fix incorrect lockdep condition in filter_chain() Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260128-uprobe_rcu-v2-1-994ea6d32730@debian.org \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox