From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
Cc: liujing.root@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
liujing40@xiaomi.com, martin.lau@kernel.org, clm@meta.com,
ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] bpf: Implement kretprobe fallback for kprobe multi link
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 09:13:46 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260129091346.0744de91bb053b24ba679438@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ee5b08b6cebfc87b552a0fde1f09fd5a2c190813760aa7e68f1e6d060f15ccd@mail.kernel.org>
On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 13:33:31 +0000 (UTC)
bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > index 1fd07c10378f..426a1c627508 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > +int bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *prog)
> > +{
> > + struct bpf_kprobe_multi_link *link = NULL;
> > + struct bpf_link_primer link_primer;
> > + struct bpf_kprobe *kprobes = NULL;
> > + u32 flags, cnt;
> > + u64 __user *ucookies;
> > + unsigned long __user *uaddrs;
> > + unsigned long __user *usyms;
> > + int err, i;
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > + for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
> > + unsigned long addr;
> > +
> > + if (uaddrs) {
> > + if (__get_user(addr, uaddrs + i)) {
> > + err = -EFAULT;
> > + goto error;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + unsigned long __user usymbol;
> > + char buf[KSYM_NAME_LEN];
> > +
> > + if (__get_user(usymbol, usyms + i)) {
> > + err = -EFAULT;
> > + goto error;
> > + }
> > + err = strncpy_from_user(buf, (const char __user *) usymbol, KSYM_NAME_LEN);
> > + if (err == KSYM_NAME_LEN)
> > + err = -E2BIG;
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + goto error;
> > +
> > + addr = kallsyms_lookup_name(buf);
> > + if (!addr)
> > + goto error;
>
> When kallsyms_lookup_name() returns 0 (symbol not found), is err being set
> to an error code before jumping to the error label? It looks like err will
> still hold the positive return value from strncpy_from_user() (the string
> length), which would be returned to the caller as a success indication.
Good catch. It should set err = -ENOENT.
Thanks,
>
> The error label at the end of the function does:
>
> error:
> kvfree(kprobes);
> kfree(link);
> return err;
>
> This could cause the syscall to return a positive value to userspace instead
> of an error, and also leak a prog reference since link_create() only calls
> bpf_prog_put() when ret < 0.
>
> > + }
> > + if (prog->kprobe_override && !within_error_injection_list(addr)) {
> > + err = -EINVAL;
> > + goto error;
> > + }
>
> [ ... ]
>
>
> ---
> AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
> See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
>
> CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/20338242683
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-29 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-18 13:06 [PATCH 0/2] bpf: Add kretprobe fallback for kprobe multi link liujing40
2025-12-18 13:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] bpf: Prepare for kprobe multi link fallback patch liujing40
2025-12-18 13:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] bpf: Implement kretprobe fallback for kprobe multi link liujing40
2025-12-18 13:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-29 0:13 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2025-12-18 17:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-12-18 21:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-12-22 8:00 ` liujing40
2025-12-19 1:57 ` Menglong Dong
2025-12-22 8:02 ` liujing40
2025-12-22 17:15 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260129091346.0744de91bb053b24ba679438@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liujing.root@gmail.com \
--cc=liujing40@xiaomi.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox