From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: <hu.shengming@zte.com.cn>
Cc: <mhiramat@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
<mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <zhang.run@zte.com.cn>,
<yang.tao172@zte.com.cn>, <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] function_graph: restore direct mode when callbacks drop to one
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 22:47:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260212224752.4311a58d@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202602131034245558BcmEI95X7Sr39QGM8YLl@zte.com.cn>
On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 10:34:24 +0800 (CST)
<hu.shengming@zte.com.cn> wrote:
> From: Shengming Hu <hu.shengming@zte.com.cn>
>
> When registering a second fgraph callback, direct path is disabled
> and array loop is used instead.
> When ftrace_graph_active falls back to one, we try to re-enable direct
> mode via ftrace_graph_enable_direct(true, ...).
> But ftrace_graph_enable_direct() incorrectly disables the static key
> rather than enabling it.
> This leaves fgraph_do_direct permanently off after first multi-callback
> transition, so direct fast mode is never restored.
Good catch!
>
> Fixes: cc60ee813b503 ("function_graph: Use static_call and branch to optimize entry function")
> Signed-off-by: Shengming Hu <hu.shengming@zte.com.cn>
> ---
> kernel/trace/fgraph.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
> index cc48d16be43e..4df766c690f9 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
> @@ -1303,7 +1303,7 @@ static void ftrace_graph_enable_direct(bool enable_branch, struct fgraph_ops *go
> static_call_update(fgraph_func, func);
> static_call_update(fgraph_retfunc, retfunc);
> if (enable_branch)
> - static_branch_disable(&fgraph_do_direct);
> + static_branch_enable(&fgraph_do_direct);
> }
Your email client killed your patch. it has huge white-space damage.
But because it's such a trivial change, I'll fix it up for you. But
next time please make sure your email client doesn't corrupt your
patches.
Thanks,
-- Steve
>
> static void ftrace_graph_disable_direct(bool disable_branch)
> --
> 2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-13 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-13 2:34 [PATCH] function_graph: restore direct mode when callbacks drop to one hu.shengming
2026-02-13 3:47 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2026-02-13 6:34 ` hu.shengming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260212224752.4311a58d@fedora \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=hu.shengming@zte.com.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=yang.tao172@zte.com.cn \
--cc=yang.yang29@zte.com.cn \
--cc=zhang.run@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox