From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: ring-buffer: Fix to check event length before using
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 17:13:44 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260218171344.85677f1bd5494a3a728acfdd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <177123421541.142205.9414352170164678966.stgit@devnote2>
I found another problem. Let me make a series for fixing issues.
Thanks,
On Mon, 16 Feb 2026 18:30:15 +0900
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
>
> Check the event length before adding it for accessing next index in
> rb_read_data_buffer(). Since this function is used for validating
> possibly broken ring buffers, the length of the event could be broken.
> In that case, the new event (e + len) can point a wrong address.
> To avoid invalid memory access at boot, check whether the length of
> each event is in the possible range before using it.
>
> Fixes: 5f3b6e839f3c ("ring-buffer: Validate boot range memory events")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> ---
> kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index 630221b00838..1ef17d6fd824 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -1848,6 +1848,7 @@ static int rb_read_data_buffer(struct buffer_data_page *dpage, int tail, int cpu
> struct ring_buffer_event *event;
> u64 ts, delta;
> int events = 0;
> + int len;
> int e;
>
> *delta_ptr = 0;
> @@ -1855,9 +1856,12 @@ static int rb_read_data_buffer(struct buffer_data_page *dpage, int tail, int cpu
>
> ts = dpage->time_stamp;
>
> - for (e = 0; e < tail; e += rb_event_length(event)) {
> + for (e = 0; e < tail; e += len) {
>
> event = (struct ring_buffer_event *)(dpage->data + e);
> + len = rb_event_length(event);
> + if (len <= 0 || len > tail - e)
> + return -1;
>
> switch (event->type_len) {
>
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-18 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-16 9:30 [PATCH] tracing: ring-buffer: Fix to check event length before using Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-02-18 8:13 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260218171344.85677f1bd5494a3a728acfdd@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox