From: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
<jolsa@kernel.org>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
<linux-open-source@crowdstrike.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] Optimize kprobe.session attachment for exact function names
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 15:08:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260302200837.317907-1-andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com> (raw)
When libbpf attaches kprobe.session programs with exact function names
(the common case: SEC("kprobe.session/vfs_read")), the current code path
has two independent performance bottlenecks:
1. Userspace (libbpf): attach_kprobe_session() always parses
/proc/kallsyms to resolve function names, even when the name is exact
(no wildcards). This takes ~150ms per function.
2. Kernel (ftrace): ftrace_lookup_symbols() does a full O(N) linear scan
over ~200K kernel symbols via kallsyms_on_each_symbol(), decompressing
every symbol name, even when resolving a single symbol (cnt == 1).
This series optimizes both layers:
- Patch 1: libbpf detects exact function names (no wildcards) in
bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts() and bypasses kallsyms parsing,
passing the symbol directly to the kernel via syms[] array.
ESRCH is normalized to ENOENT for API consistency.
- Patch 2: ftrace_lookup_symbols() uses kallsyms_lookup_name() for
O(log N) binary search when cnt == 1, with fallback to linear scan for
duplicate symbols. Included here for context; this patch is destined
for the tracing tree via linux-trace-kernel (Steven Rostedt).
- Patch 3: Selftests validating exact-name attachment via
kprobe_multi_session.c and error consistency between wildcard and exact
paths in test_attach_api_fails.
Changes since v3 [3]:
- Skip fast path when unique_match is set (Jiri Olsa, CI bot)
Changes since v2 [2]:
- Use if/else-if instead of goto (Jiri Olsa)
- Use syms = &pattern directly (Jiri Olsa)
- Drop unneeded pattern = NULL (Jiri Olsa)
- Revert cosmetic rename in attach_kprobe_session (Jiri Olsa)
- Remove "module symbols" from ftrace comment (CI bot)
Changes since v1 [1]:
- Move optimization into attach_kprobe_multi_opts (Jiri Olsa)
- Use ftrace_location as boolean check only (Jiri Olsa)
- Remove verbose perf rationale from comment (Steven Rostedt)
- Consolidate tests into existing subtests (Jiri Olsa)
- Delete standalone _syms.c and _errors.c files
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260223215113.924599-1-andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260226173342.3565919-1-andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260227204052.725813-1-andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com/
Andrey Grodzovsky (3):
libbpf: Optimize kprobe.session attachment for exact function names
ftrace: Use kallsyms binary search for single-symbol lookup
selftests/bpf: add tests for kprobe.session optimization
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 22 +++++++++++++
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 19 ++++++++++-
.../bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++--
.../bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_session.c | 10 ++++++
4 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-02 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-02 20:08 Andrey Grodzovsky [this message]
2026-03-02 20:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/3] libbpf: Optimize kprobe.session attachment for exact function names Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-03-02 20:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/3] ftrace: Use kallsyms binary search for single-symbol lookup Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-03-02 20:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/3] selftests/bpf: add tests for kprobe.session optimization Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-03-05 23:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] Optimize kprobe.session attachment for exact function names patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260302200837.317907-1-andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com \
--to=andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-open-source@crowdstrike.com \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox