From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: abhijithsriram95@gmail.com
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list),
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list:TRACING)
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kernel/trace: fixed static warnings
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2026 16:18:01 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260406161801.d507eeb247eb8b3b17f490a8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260406060046.223496-2-abhijithsriram95@gmail.com>
On Mon, 6 Apr 2026 08:00:36 +0200
abhijithsriram95@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Abhijith Sriram <abhijithsriram95@gmail.com>
>
> The change in the function argument description
> was due to the static code checker script reading
> the word filter back to back
>
> Changes in v2:
> - corrected *m = file->private_data to m = file->private_data
>
> Changes in v3:
> - reverted the changes for struct seq_file *m and
> added a new empty line instead
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhijith Sriram <abhijithsriram95@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c | 8 +++++---
> new-changes | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 new-changes
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> index 655db2e82513..08adb593fcd9 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ event_triggers_post_call(struct trace_event_file *file,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(event_triggers_post_call);
>
> -#define SHOW_AVAILABLE_TRIGGERS (void *)(1UL)
> +#define SHOW_AVAILABLE_TRIGGERS ((void *)(1UL))
>
> static void *trigger_next(struct seq_file *m, void *t, loff_t *pos)
> {
> @@ -352,6 +352,7 @@ static int event_trigger_regex_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> ret = seq_open(file, &event_triggers_seq_ops);
> if (!ret) {
> struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
> +
> m->private = file;
> }
> }
> @@ -388,9 +389,9 @@ static ssize_t event_trigger_regex_write(struct file *file,
> const char __user *ubuf,
> size_t cnt, loff_t *ppos)
> {
> + char *buf __free(kfree) = NULL;
> struct trace_event_file *event_file;
> ssize_t ret;
> - char *buf __free(kfree) = NULL;
Again, this is not OK. Even if checkpatch.pl complained against this,
there should be no problem. Only if you think this is not sorted by
length, you can do:
struct trace_event_file *event_file;
+ char *buf __free(kfree) = NULL;
ssize_t ret;
- char *buf __free(kfree) = NULL;
This change is acceptable as a cosmetic change.
>
> if (!cnt)
> return 0;
> @@ -633,6 +634,7 @@ clear_event_triggers(struct trace_array *tr)
>
> list_for_each_entry(file, &tr->events, list) {
> struct event_trigger_data *data, *n;
> +
> list_for_each_entry_safe(data, n, &file->triggers, list) {
> trace_event_trigger_enable_disable(file, 0);
> list_del_rcu(&data->list);
> @@ -785,7 +787,7 @@ static void unregister_trigger(char *glob,
> * cmd - the trigger command name
> * glob - the trigger command name optionally prefaced with '!'
> * param_and_filter - text following cmd and ':'
> - * param - text following cmd and ':' and stripped of filter
> + * param - text following cmd and ':' and filter removed
> * filter - the optional filter text following (and including) 'if'
> *
> * To illustrate the use of these components, here are some concrete
> diff --git a/new-changes b/new-changes
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9e3a24de3033
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/new-changes
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +Line 25 -> adding const to the pointer address as well.
> +
> +linw 1193 -> removing else because there is a return statement in the if condition
> +line 1727 -> adding new line after statement
> +line 1800 -> reordering to solve missing a blank line warning
> +line 12364 -> changed the function to kstrtoul
> \ No newline at end of file
Is this your working note?
Please remove it.
Thank you,
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-06 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-06 6:00 [PATCH v3] kernel/trace: fixed static warnings abhijithsriram95
2026-04-06 7:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2026-04-06 7:30 ` Abhijith Sriram
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260406161801.d507eeb247eb8b3b17f490a8@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=abhijithsriram95@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox