public inbox for linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] tracepoint: balance regfunc() on func_add() failure in tracepoint_add_func()
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 20:06:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260413190601.21993-1-devnexen@gmail.com> (raw)

When a tracepoint goes through the 0 -> 1 transition, tracepoint_add_func()
invokes the subsystem's ext->regfunc() before attempting to install the
new probe via func_add(). If func_add() then fails (for example, when
allocate_probes() cannot allocate a new probe array under memory pressure
and returns -ENOMEM), the function returns the error without calling the
matching ext->unregfunc(), leaving the side effects of regfunc() behind
with no installed probe to justify them.

For syscall tracepoints this is particularly unpleasant: syscall_regfunc()
bumps sys_tracepoint_refcount and sets SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT on every task.
After a leaked failure, the refcount is stuck at a non-zero value with no
consumer, and every task continues paying the syscall trace entry/exit
overhead until reboot. Other subsystems providing regfunc()/unregfunc()
pairs exhibit similarly scoped persistent state.

Mirror the existing 1 -> 0 cleanup and call ext->unregfunc() in the
func_add() error path, gated on the same condition used there so the
unwind is symmetric with the registration.

Fixes: 8cf868affdc4 ("tracing: Have the reg function allow to fail")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/tracepoint.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/tracepoint.c b/kernel/tracepoint.c
index 91905aa19294..dffef52a807b 100644
--- a/kernel/tracepoint.c
+++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c
@@ -300,6 +300,8 @@ static int tracepoint_add_func(struct tracepoint *tp,
 			lockdep_is_held(&tracepoints_mutex));
 	old = func_add(&tp_funcs, func, prio);
 	if (IS_ERR(old)) {
+		if (tp->ext && tp->ext->unregfunc && !static_key_enabled(&tp->key))
+			tp->ext->unregfunc();
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(warn && PTR_ERR(old) != -ENOMEM);
 		return PTR_ERR(old);
 	}
-- 
2.53.0


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-04-13 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260413190601.21993-1-devnexen@gmail.com \
    --to=devnexen@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox