From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@kernel.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 07/10] ring-buffer: Skip invalid sub-buffers for iterator
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 22:58:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260520225808.024fcf4d@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260521115125.a2a1d90c5913bd4d27cb9107@kernel.org>
On Thu, 21 May 2026 11:51:25 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Fixes: **TBD** ring-buffer: Skip invalid sub-buffers when validating persistent ring buffer
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> Should we merge this into the original one?
>
> Anyway, this looks good to me.
I could. I never know how to do this really. That is, I always feel
uncomfortable modifying someone else's patch. But I could add:
[ SDR: Added skip of invalid sub-buffer for iterator case ]
Above my SOB.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-20 18:49 [PATCH v20 00/10] ring-buffer: Making persistent ring buffers robust Steven Rostedt
2026-05-20 18:49 ` [PATCH v20 01/10] ring-buffer: Skip invalid sub-buffers when validating persistent ring buffer Steven Rostedt
2026-05-20 18:49 ` [PATCH v20 02/10] ring-buffer: Skip invalid sub-buffers when rewinding " Steven Rostedt
2026-05-20 18:49 ` [PATCH v20 03/10] ring-buffer: Add persistent ring buffer invalid-page inject test Steven Rostedt
2026-05-20 18:49 ` [PATCH v20 04/10] ring-buffer: Show commit numbers in buffer_meta file Steven Rostedt
2026-05-20 18:49 ` [PATCH v20 05/10] ring-buffer: Cleanup persistent ring buffer validation Steven Rostedt
2026-05-20 18:49 ` [PATCH v20 06/10] ring-buffer: Cleanup buffer_data_page related code Steven Rostedt
2026-05-20 18:49 ` [PATCH v20 07/10] ring-buffer: Skip invalid sub-buffers for iterator Steven Rostedt
2026-05-21 2:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-05-21 2:58 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2026-05-20 18:49 ` [PATCH v20 08/10] ring-buffer: Have dropped subbuffers be persistent across reboots Steven Rostedt
2026-05-21 6:29 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-05-20 18:49 ` [PATCH v20 09/10] ring-buffer: Show persistent buffer dropped events in trace file Steven Rostedt
2026-05-21 6:34 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-05-20 18:49 ` [PATCH v20 10/10] ring-buffer: Show persistent buffer dropped events in trace_pipe file Steven Rostedt
2026-05-21 8:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-05-21 8:13 ` [PATCH v20 00/10] ring-buffer: Making persistent ring buffers robust Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260520225808.024fcf4d@fedora \
--to=rostedt@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox