From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88A0840B6E6; Tue, 26 May 2026 17:42:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779817321; cv=none; b=ElPp+77jp1lJXvRv623SUBiigqs4y6An0zCUjB5VuJ2BeT3WpT+k6lrNgtuI4FonNYZyH28zuDnaohpL3/9sjE6hK9G4jtwtr18gXnb9zFtOoCxgZwyb6fNhgnIQ+Q3K8pFIeEs+SZEKeRJqAeWkspYt2YyngtuJIiEMoCQJvxY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779817321; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oA9SYI3Vg6WjJ4my1cbreo9H4SpR6X837lBLcyW3YhU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QuZVhaNUB+uY75TXJTjtNU2tuYUu6PI0fxlojDrae0u33adtQ2z/Ye6e29NT6iaCm5+mPs4O82YEBxzmjFOa5H7DoD70ZrZNxErkimyyBNpNK/NSUZo28fcmyFmm3yMiSOyr7+fDfXgU1qaoUJLpXwqV45JYHA+Gxfuq9HLSlKI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=an5wcbJQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="an5wcbJQ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73BAB1F000E9; Tue, 26 May 2026 17:41:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779817320; bh=Cv7RpCZ0KM+t4lyA/0h2jSx7KpF5KVLWtYodP6cq/2A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=an5wcbJQm1oN36GxareExRezPK4urPhPMC179lNuWGdcqh/Nx+aQCkJQc7IHivPOx oYJYlAloklib5Ojlg/h0hsgjBmFmnPDhpdRjMWVx9F03MBTwh0mEajN8uEi4EkotAM gDHzDOH+iwRLkn4HVb2KHEDidiAFMSOZpkb1RUT6awDlEzAVitq4lUGDXjq7h7SVmN WI8OEsMQeNrXTALvxmFcqFKNELf3I8+bPfvXRkwi0zW4ipNgtn/1x7wqOuEnZi/eE+ TkiixAULbjfVMp43m/U/dNVMtozLMvYy8A6cF9N06s8t7cH6e4MRKslvMHvb56ZH3B Ajo/3fNXeh8uA== Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 13:42:31 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland , Mathieu Desnoyers , Andrew Morton , Ian Rogers Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 0/9] ring-buffer: Making persistent ring buffers robust Message-ID: <20260526134231.1a65aef5@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20260526141746.cf0b3c0bed5db3baf8914095@kernel.org> References: <20260522170857.263969486@kernel.org> <20260526141746.cf0b3c0bed5db3baf8914095@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.20.0git84 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 26 May 2026 14:17:46 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > On Fri, 22 May 2026 13:08:57 -0400 > Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > This is to make the persistent ring buffer more robust when sub-buffers > > are detected to be corrupted. Instead of invalidating the entire buffer, > > just invalidate the individual sub-buffers. > > > > I started with Masami's patches and modified some from Sashiko reviews. > > I added a few patches to display the dropped events when the persistent > > ring buffers validation checks found sub-buffers were dropped due to being > > corrupted data. > > It seems that Sashiko still marks it "Incompleted". > Maybe we need base-commit: tag in this cover mail? > I also guess that this series does not use "In-Reply-To:" but > only uses "References:" tag in the mail header. I guess > Sashiko's mail header parser missed it. But this applies to mainline. I'm not sure why it's having problems. -- Steve