Linux Trace Kernel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@ilvokhin.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@broadcom.com>,
	Alexey Makhalov <alexey.makhalov@broadcom.com>,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] locking: Add contended_release tracepoint to qspinlock
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 14:08:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260603120811.GW3493090@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <agXBb0ga_6HJrrnm@shell.ilvokhin.com>

On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 12:34:55PM +0000, Dmitry Ilvokhin wrote:

> Baseline, in best case scenario of least number of executed
> instructions.
> 
>     3e0:  endbr64                          ; 4 bytes (always executed)
>     3e4:  movb $0x0,(%rdi)                 ; 3 bytes (unlock,
>                                            ; always executed)
>     3e7:  decl %gs:__preempt_count         ; 7 bytes (always executed)
>     3ee:  je   3f5                         ; 2 bytes (always executed)
>     3f0:  jmp  __x86_return_thunk          ; 5 bytes (executed if above
>                                            ; je is not taken)
>                                            ; rest is not executed
>     3f5:  call __SCT__preempt_schedule     ; 5 bytes
>     3fa:  jmp  __x86_return_thunk          ; 5 bytes
> 
> Tracepoint (again same case of least number of executed instructions).
> 
>     bc0:  endbr64                          ; 4 bytes (always executed)
>     bc4:  xchg %ax,%ax                     ; 2 bytes (always executed, this is an
>                                            ; only addition on the execution path).
>     bc6:  movb $0x0,(%rdi)                 ; 3 bytes (unlock, always executed)
>     bc9:  decl %gs:__preempt_count         ; 7 bytes (always executed)
>     bd0:  je   bde                         ; 2 bytes (always executed)
>     bd2:  jmp  __x86_return_thunk          ; 5 bytes (executed if above
>                                            ; je is not taken)
>                                            ; rest is not executed
>     bd7:  call queued_spin_release_traced  ; 5 bytes
>     bdc:  jmp  bc9                         ; 2 bytes
>     bde:  call __SCT__preempt_schedule     ; 5 bytes
>     be3:  jmp  __x86_return_thunk          ; 5 bytes
> 

So I've been playing with this a bit, and it is all really sad.

Now, since pretty much everybody+dog will have PARAVIRT_SPINLOCK=y, the
'best' solution would be changing that paravirt call with a
static_call(), that actually shrinks the code by 1 byte.

And then this tracepoint nonsense can simply use a different unlock
function, just like paravirt.

0000 00000000000001d0 <_raw_spin_unlock>:
0000  1d0:	f3 0f 1e fa          	endbr64
0004  1d4:	ff 15 00 00 00 00    	call   *0x0(%rip)        # 1da <_raw_spin_unlock+0xa>	1d6: R_X86_64_PC32	pv_ops_lock+0x4
000a  1da:	65 ff 0d 00 00 00 00 	decl   %gs:0x0(%rip)        # 1e1 <_raw_spin_unlock+0x11>	1dd: R_X86_64_PC32	__preempt_count-0x4
0011  1e1:	74 06                	je     1e9 <_raw_spin_unlock+0x19>
0013  1e3:	2e e9 00 00 00 00    	cs jmp 1e9 <_raw_spin_unlock+0x19>	1e5: R_X86_64_PLT32	__x86_return_thunk-0x4
0019  1e9:	e8 00 00 00 00       	call   1ee <_raw_spin_unlock+0x1e>	1ea: R_X86_64_PLT32	__SCT__preempt_schedule-0x4
001e  1ee:	2e e9 00 00 00 00    	cs jmp 1f4 <_raw_spin_unlock+0x24>	1f0: R_X86_64_PLT32	__x86_return_thunk-0x4


0000 00000000000001d0 <_raw_spin_unlock>:
0000  1d0:	f3 0f 1e fa          	endbr64
0004  1d4:	e8 00 00 00 00       	call   1d9 <_raw_spin_unlock+0x9>	1d5: R_X86_64_PLT32	__SCT__queued_spin_unlock-0x4
0009  1d9:	65 ff 0d 00 00 00 00 	decl   %gs:0x0(%rip)        # 1e0 <_raw_spin_unlock+0x10>	1dc: R_X86_64_PC32	__preempt_count-0x4
0010  1e0:	74 06                	je     1e8 <_raw_spin_unlock+0x18>
0012  1e2:	2e e9 00 00 00 00    	cs jmp 1e8 <_raw_spin_unlock+0x18>	1e4: R_X86_64_PLT32	__x86_return_thunk-0x4
0018  1e8:	e8 00 00 00 00       	call   1ed <_raw_spin_unlock+0x1d>	1e9: R_X86_64_PLT32	__SCT__preempt_schedule-0x4
001d  1ed:	2e e9 00 00 00 00    	cs jmp 1f3 <_raw_spin_unlock+0x23>	1ef: R_X86_64_PLT32	__x86_return_thunk-0x4


Something a little like so, which is completely untested, except to
build kernel/locking/spinlock.o (with clang-23).

Also, I think someone should go do some performance runs with
ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_* set for x86 just like for s390.

Of course, this is only x86 done, and it doesn't nicely tie in with
tracepoints, but it does give the sanest asm.

---
diff --git a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_spinlock.c b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_spinlock.c
index 210b494e4de0..6b4bdea18218 100644
--- a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_spinlock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_spinlock.c
@@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ void __init hv_init_spinlocks(void)
 	pr_info("PV spinlocks enabled\n");
 
 	__pv_init_lock_hash();
-	pv_ops_lock.queued_spin_lock_slowpath = __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath;
-	pv_ops_lock.queued_spin_unlock = PV_CALLEE_SAVE(__pv_queued_spin_unlock);
+	static_call_update(queued_spin_lock_slowpath, __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
+	static_call_update(queued_spin_unlock, __raw_callee_save___pv_queued_spin_unlock);
 	pv_ops_lock.wait = hv_qlock_wait;
 	pv_ops_lock.kick = hv_qlock_kick;
 	pv_ops_lock.vcpu_is_preempted = PV_CALLEE_SAVE(hv_vcpu_is_preempted);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
index 1d506e5d6f46..52e7ce10df57 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
@@ -225,7 +225,6 @@
 #define X86_FEATURE_EPT_AD		( 8*32+17) /* "ept_ad" Intel Extended Page Table access-dirty bit */
 #define X86_FEATURE_VMCALL		( 8*32+18) /* Hypervisor supports the VMCALL instruction */
 #define X86_FEATURE_VMW_VMMCALL		( 8*32+19) /* VMware prefers VMMCALL hypercall instruction */
-#define X86_FEATURE_PVUNLOCK		( 8*32+20) /* PV unlock function */
 #define X86_FEATURE_VCPUPREEMPT		( 8*32+21) /* PV vcpu_is_preempted function */
 #define X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST		( 8*32+22) /* "tdx_guest" Intel Trust Domain Extensions Guest */
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt-spinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt-spinlock.h
index 7beffcb08ed6..553910f92906 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt-spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt-spinlock.h
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 #define _ASM_X86_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCK_H
 
 #include <asm/paravirt_types.h>
+#include <linux/static_call_types.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 #include <asm/spinlock_types.h>
@@ -11,9 +12,6 @@
 struct qspinlock;
 
 struct pv_lock_ops {
-	void (*queued_spin_lock_slowpath)(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val);
-	struct paravirt_callee_save queued_spin_unlock;
-
 	void (*wait)(u8 *ptr, u8 val);
 	void (*kick)(int cpu);
 
@@ -26,20 +24,23 @@ extern struct pv_lock_ops pv_ops_lock;
 extern void native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val);
 extern void __pv_init_lock_hash(void);
 extern void __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val);
+extern void __raw_callee_save___native_queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock);
 extern void __raw_callee_save___pv_queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock);
 extern bool nopvspin;
 
+DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(queued_spin_lock_slowpath, native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
+DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(queued_spin_unlock, __raw_callee_save___native_queued_spin_unlock);
+
 static __always_inline void pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock,
 							 u32 val)
 {
-	PVOP_VCALL2(pv_ops_lock, queued_spin_lock_slowpath, lock, val);
+	static_call(queued_spin_lock_slowpath)(lock, val);
 }
 
 static __always_inline void pv_queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock)
 {
-	PVOP_ALT_VCALLEE1(pv_ops_lock, queued_spin_unlock, lock,
-			  "movb $0, (%%" _ASM_ARG1 ")",
-			  ALT_NOT(X86_FEATURE_PVUNLOCK));
+	__STATIC_CALL_MOD_ADDRESSABLE(queued_spin_unlock);
+	asm volatile ("call " STATIC_CALL_TRAMP_STR(queued_spin_unlock) : ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT);
 }
 
 static __always_inline bool pv_vcpu_is_preempted(long cpu)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
index 29226d112029..5908d9fd94bb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
@@ -1135,9 +1135,8 @@ void __init kvm_spinlock_init(void)
 	pr_info("PV spinlocks enabled\n");
 
 	__pv_init_lock_hash();
-	pv_ops_lock.queued_spin_lock_slowpath = __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath;
-	pv_ops_lock.queued_spin_unlock =
-		PV_CALLEE_SAVE(__pv_queued_spin_unlock);
+	static_call_update(queued_spin_lock_slowpath, __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
+	static_call_update(queued_spin_unlock, __raw_callee_save___pv_queued_spin_unlock);
 	pv_ops_lock.wait = kvm_wait;
 	pv_ops_lock.kick = kvm_kick_cpu;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c
index 95452444868f..28407304f123 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c
@@ -25,9 +25,12 @@ __visible void __native_queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock)
 }
 PV_CALLEE_SAVE_REGS_THUNK(__native_queued_spin_unlock);
 
+DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(queued_spin_lock_slowpath, native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
+DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(queued_spin_unlock, __raw_callee_save___native_queued_spin_unlock);
+
 bool pv_is_native_spin_unlock(void)
 {
-	return pv_ops_lock.queued_spin_unlock.func ==
+	return static_call_query(queued_spin_unlock) ==
 		__raw_callee_save___native_queued_spin_unlock;
 }
 
@@ -45,16 +48,11 @@ bool pv_is_native_vcpu_is_preempted(void)
 
 void __init paravirt_set_cap(void)
 {
-	if (!pv_is_native_spin_unlock())
-		setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_PVUNLOCK);
-
 	if (!pv_is_native_vcpu_is_preempted())
 		setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_VCPUPREEMPT);
 }
 
 struct pv_lock_ops pv_ops_lock = {
-	.queued_spin_lock_slowpath	= native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath,
-	.queued_spin_unlock		= PV_CALLEE_SAVE(__native_queued_spin_unlock),
 	.wait				= paravirt_nop,
 	.kick				= paravirt_nop,
 	.vcpu_is_preempted		= PV_CALLEE_SAVE(__native_vcpu_is_preempted),
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c b/arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c
index 61592e41a6b1..1268b7dc93b1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 #include <linux/memory.h>
 #include <linux/bug.h>
 #include <asm/text-patching.h>
+#include <asm/paravirt-spinlock.h>
 
 enum insn_type {
 	CALL = 0, /* site call */
@@ -31,6 +32,15 @@ static const u8 retinsn[] = { RET_INSN_OPCODE, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc };
  */
 static const u8 warninsn[] = { 0x67, 0x48, 0x0f, 0xb9, 0x3a };
 
+/*
+ * ds ds movb $0, (_ASM_ARG1)
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
+static const u8 unlockinsn[] = { 0x3e, 0x3e, 0xc6, 0x07, 0x00 };
+#else
+static const u8 unlockinsn[] = { 0x3e, 0x3e, 0xc6, 0x00, 0x00 };
+#endif
+
 static u8 __is_Jcc(u8 *insn) /* Jcc.d32 */
 {
 	u8 ret = 0;
@@ -78,6 +88,10 @@ static void __ref __static_call_transform(void *insn, enum insn_type type,
 			emulate = code;
 			code = &warninsn;
 		}
+		if (func == &__raw_callee_save___native_queued_spin_unlock) {
+			emulate = code;
+			code = &unlockinsn;
+		}
 		break;
 
 	case NOP:
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
index 83ac24ead289..f718e535ea7c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
@@ -134,9 +134,8 @@ void __init xen_init_spinlocks(void)
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "xen: PV spinlocks enabled\n");
 
 	__pv_init_lock_hash();
-	pv_ops_lock.queued_spin_lock_slowpath = __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath;
-	pv_ops_lock.queued_spin_unlock =
-		PV_CALLEE_SAVE(__pv_queued_spin_unlock);
+	static_call_update(queued_spin_lock_slowpath, __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
+	static_call_update(queued_spin_unlock, __raw_callee_save___pv_queued_spin_unlock);
 	pv_ops_lock.wait = xen_qlock_wait;
 	pv_ops_lock.kick = xen_qlock_kick;
 	pv_ops_lock.vcpu_is_preempted = PV_CALLEE_SAVE(xen_vcpu_stolen);
diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
index 86d17b195e79..61541f042f74 100644
--- a/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
+++ b/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
@@ -225,7 +225,6 @@
 #define X86_FEATURE_EPT_AD		( 8*32+17) /* "ept_ad" Intel Extended Page Table access-dirty bit */
 #define X86_FEATURE_VMCALL		( 8*32+18) /* Hypervisor supports the VMCALL instruction */
 #define X86_FEATURE_VMW_VMMCALL		( 8*32+19) /* VMware prefers VMMCALL hypercall instruction */
-#define X86_FEATURE_PVUNLOCK		( 8*32+20) /* PV unlock function */
 #define X86_FEATURE_VCPUPREEMPT		( 8*32+21) /* PV vcpu_is_preempted function */
 #define X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST		( 8*32+22) /* "tdx_guest" Intel Trust Domain Extensions Guest */
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-03 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-05 17:09 [PATCH v6 0/7] locking: contended_release tracepoint instrumentation Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-05-05 17:09 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] tracing/lock: Remove unnecessary linux/sched.h include Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-05-05 17:09 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] locking/percpu-rwsem: Extract __percpu_up_read() Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-05-05 17:09 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] locking: Add contended_release tracepoint to sleepable locks Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-05-05 17:09 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] locking: Factor out queued_spin_release() Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-05-13 15:37   ` Steven Rostedt
2026-05-05 17:09 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] locking: Add contended_release tracepoint to qspinlock Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-05-13 15:41   ` Steven Rostedt
2026-05-14 14:13     ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-05-14 16:03       ` Steven Rostedt
2026-05-15 14:40         ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-05-13 19:33   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-14 12:34     ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-05-27 13:30       ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-06-03 12:08       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-06-03 14:17         ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-06-03 14:26           ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-05 17:09 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] locking: Factor out __queued_read_unlock()/__queued_write_unlock() Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-05-13 15:41   ` Steven Rostedt
2026-05-05 17:09 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] locking: Add contended_release tracepoint to qrwlock Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-05-13 15:43   ` Steven Rostedt
2026-05-13 19:26 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] locking: contended_release tracepoint instrumentation Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260603120811.GW3493090@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ajay.kaher@broadcom.com \
    --cc=alexey.makhalov@broadcom.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=d@ilvokhin.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox