From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E841829C328; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 23:36:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781134619; cv=none; b=mGlylTHTJBI+g3S32sqUJN2nty6CButOWgMmY2tgJBY//Etsk6BaVCV7GguyHJ2xYwZA1tMeoMSleErrJ6CWkKekve3TPoXHjZg89AGqxa6hT7mqwCS5JD7qQaApORT5KCuETKS0RszfKp1NdA5G7sY+LzsaTLn4Q+QH+XcLccU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781134619; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VCVCOjXPTtK4G11i+IY3ZJ4sgEJA4p10ZObDPKF/III=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=La29E2g1EJ5UP5CXsYWg08KEUk/rIpfL4tP6ACfHs2+nngrS5OqfnxMj702/i8425SIjEXLZrtqn9WlH36D2Rz8EV6EwH5YUF7A/8PZpnH4SAeLzfihqAdLTx5jpvvMFv17IPpwVk+eJgNu8b6E55JL/sxkf7orRQbNxjM/Ut8Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=V9olKbpj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="V9olKbpj" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B633F1F00893; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 23:36:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1781134618; bh=J/HJPNa4Oa5DLM5df/yKw+CscA/qZXvMF0PIQU0JPWg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=V9olKbpjJXSmWwsrWI9yU7LD3jo8E4jJVQIa7SKztF8hn+yzrWQ2uIE3jjnxrF7/l w9390+npwpd2GKOVjZe43fglD+CB1VDU7AQznNphuEFHvHXd1lmkX2J6QiPgcMb63a qznCw+fNa81Z1e1sPGInUlG2XFjpVFqmUAlcZp4eIPPTU2fHdDGd8yxk+7jiOnnecc iGmcAWoOvcTDAq9sQq4nxwOMfaagFyrFMADeuCfVTizmmUT6gqLLMqPmAWPtmpqqc5 q8ylHsS5PGpOomB8gXS9boORsd2PGZP1X1SjwcPMgDopAd/2W8Jr2lvPrGbdYWl8L0 eBO7poY2Twvyg== Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:36:47 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: "Jose Fernandez (Anthropic)" Cc: Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Florent Revest , Puranjay Mohan , Xu Kuohai Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: ftrace: support DIRECT_CALLS without CALL_OPS Message-ID: <20260610233647.GB3099686@ax162> References: <20260609-arm64-ftrace-direct-calls-v1-0-4a46f266697f@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260609-arm64-ftrace-direct-calls-v1-0-4a46f266697f@linux.dev> Hi Jose, On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 05:19:25AM +0000, Jose Fernandez (Anthropic) wrote: > Jose Fernandez (Anthropic) (2): > arm64: ftrace: prepare ftrace_modify_call() for use without CALL_OPS > arm64: ftrace: allow DIRECT_CALLS without CALL_OPS Thanks, I applied these two changes on -next and it looks like it resolves the issue I originally noticed with systemd's restrict-fs program not working on both of my arm64 machines. Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor -- Cheers, Nathan