Linux Trace Kernel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com>
Cc: "catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"naveen@kernel.org" <naveen@kernel.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"yang@os.amperecomputing.com" <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia@transsion.com>,
	Jiazi Li <jiazi.li@transsion.com>,
	"ada.coupriediaz@arm.com" <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] arm64: kprobes: Fix single-step fault and reentry handling
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 22:43:45 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260701224345.c3a215ece3660a0cbae67645@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701121448.3926-1-hupu@transsion.com>

On Wed, 1 Jul 2026 12:14:54 +0000
Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com> wrote:

> From: hupu <hupu@transsion.com>
> 
> This series fixes two arm64 kprobes issues observed when running
> simpleperf with preemptirq tracepoints and dwarf callchains while a
> kprobe is active on a frequently executed kernel function.
> 
> The crash happens in the kprobe debug exception path. While a kprobe is
> preparing or executing its XOL single-step instruction, perf/trace code
> can run in the same window. That code may either take a fault of its own
> or hit another kprobe.
> 
> Patch 1 makes kprobe_fault_handler() handle a fault in
> KPROBE_HIT_SS/KPROBE_REENTER only when the faulting PC points at the
> current kprobe's XOL instruction. Otherwise the fault is left to the
> normal fault handling path.
> 
> Patch 2 allows a kprobe hit in KPROBE_HIT_SS to be handled as a
> recoverable one-level reentry. Only a hit while already in
> KPROBE_REENTER remains unrecoverable.
> 
> This follows the same logic as the existing x86 fixes:
>   6381c24cd6d5 ("kprobes/x86: Fix page-fault handling logic")
>   6a5022a56ac3 ("kprobes/x86: Allow to handle reentered kprobe on single-stepping")

Good catch!! 
The series looks good to me.

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

But it should be reviewed by arm64 maintainers too.

BTW, if you are "Pu Hu", the Signed-off-by tag should be
"Pu Hu <...>" instead of "hupu <...>".

Thank you,

> 
> Reproducer:
> 
>   simpleperf record -p <pid> -f 10000 \
>     -e preemptirq:preempt_disable \
>     -e preemptirq:preempt_enable \
>     --duration 9 --call-graph dwarf \
>     -o /data/local/tmp/perf.data
> 
> Before this series, the crash reproduced frequently. With both patches
> applied, it was no longer reproduced in our testing.
> 
> hupu (2):
>   arm64: kprobes: Do not handle non-XOL faults as kprobe faults
>   arm64: kprobes: Allow reentering kprobes while single-stepping
> 
>  arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-01 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-01 12:14 [RFC 0/2] arm64: kprobes: Fix single-step fault and reentry handling Pu Hu
2026-07-01 12:14 ` [RFC 1/2] arm64: kprobes: Do not handle non-XOL faults as kprobe faults Pu Hu
2026-07-01 12:15 ` [RFC 2/2] arm64: kprobes: Allow reentering kprobes while single-stepping Pu Hu
2026-07-01 12:30 ` [RFC 0/2] arm64: kprobes: Fix single-step fault and reentry handling Pu Hu
2026-07-01 13:43 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2026-07-01 13:56   ` Pu Hu
2026-07-02 10:07     ` Pu Hu
2026-07-02 10:09       ` Pu Hu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260701224345.c3a215ece3660a0cbae67645@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hongyan.xia@transsion.com \
    --cc=hupu@transsion.com \
    --cc=jiazi.li@transsion.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox