Linux Trace Kernel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com>
Cc: "ada.coupriediaz@arm.com" <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>,
	"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia@transsion.com>,
	Jiazi Li <jiazi.li@transsion.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"naveen@kernel.org" <naveen@kernel.org>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"yang@os.amperecomputing.com" <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 2/3] arm64: kprobes: Allow reentering kprobes while single-stepping
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:09:36 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710140936.8788416564452e490c71634c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709142215.226872-3-hupu@transsion.com>

On Thu, 9 Jul 2026 14:22:25 +0000
Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com> wrote:

> From: Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com>
> 
> A kprobe can be hit while another kprobe is in KPROBE_HIT_SS state. This
> can happen when tracing or perf code runs from the debug exception path
> while the first kprobe is preparing or executing its out-of-line
> single-step instruction.
> 
> Currently arm64 treats a kprobe hit in KPROBE_HIT_SS as unrecoverable,
> the same as a hit in KPROBE_REENTER. This is too strict. A hit in
> KPROBE_HIT_SS is still a one-level reentry and can be handled by saving
> the current kprobe state and setting up single-step for the new probe,
> just like reentry from KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE or KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE.
> 
> The truly unrecoverable case is hitting another kprobe while already in
> KPROBE_REENTER, because the reentry save area has already been consumed.
> 
> Move KPROBE_HIT_SS to the recoverable reentry cases and leave
> KPROBE_REENTER as the unrecoverable nested reentry case.
> 
> This mirrors the x86 fix in commit 6a5022a56ac3
> ("kprobes/x86: Allow to handle reentered kprobe on single-stepping").
> 

Hi, as Sashiko commented, we have to save the saved_irqflag to
prev_kprobbe.

https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709142215.226872-1-hupu%40transsion.com?part=2

Thank you,

> Signed-off-by: Pu Hu <hupu@transsion.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia@transsion.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> index 798e4b091d1a..2ca5916eca2f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> @@ -240,10 +240,16 @@ static int __kprobes reenter_kprobe(struct kprobe *p,
>  	switch (kcb->kprobe_status) {
>  	case KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE:
>  	case KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE:
> +	case KPROBE_HIT_SS:
> +		/*
> +		 * A probe can be hit while another kprobe is preparing or
> +		 * executing its XOL single-step instruction. This is still a
> +		 * recoverable one-level reentry, so handle it in the same way as
> +		 * reentry from KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE or KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE.
> +		 */
>  		kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(p);
>  		setup_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 1);
>  		break;
> -	case KPROBE_HIT_SS:
>  	case KPROBE_REENTER:
>  		pr_warn("Failed to recover from reentered kprobes.\n");
>  		dump_kprobe(p);
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-10  5:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-09 14:22 [RFC v2 0/3] arm64: kprobes: Fix single-step fault and reentry handling Pu Hu
2026-07-09 14:22 ` [RFC v2 1/3] arm64: kprobes: Only handle faults originating from XOL slot Pu Hu
2026-07-10  4:10   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-07-09 14:22 ` [RFC v2 2/3] arm64: kprobes: Allow reentering kprobes while single-stepping Pu Hu
2026-07-10  5:09   ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2026-07-10  6:13     ` Pu Hu
2026-07-09 14:22 ` [RFC v2 3/3] arm64: kprobes: Save and restore saved_irqflag in prev_kprobe Pu Hu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260710140936.8788416564452e490c71634c@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hongyan.xia@transsion.com \
    --cc=hupu@transsion.com \
    --cc=jiazi.li@transsion.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox