From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Michael Wu <michael@allwinnertech.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] tracing: Fix race between update_event_fields and, event_define_fields
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 10:45:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260810104525.6a3a2e6c@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e5730d2-c631-da41-3a3a-ae35bb4895f3@allwinnertech.com>
On Mon, 10 Aug 2026 14:32:30 +0800
Michael Wu <michael@allwinnertech.com> wrote:
> The following sequence may leads race between event_define_fields()
> and update_event_fields():
> CPU0 (module A, pri=1 notifier) CPU1 (module B, pri=0 notifier)
What does the above mean? Are you loading two modules at the same time?
What does "pri=X notifier" mean? What function calls are these coming from?
-- Steve
> =============================== ===============================
> event_define_fields(call_A) trace_event_update_all()
> for each f: list_for_each_entry(...,
> list_add(&f->link, &ftrace_events)
> &class->fields) -> finds call_A
> f->link.next = next; (2)
> update_event_fields(call_A)
> WRITE_ONCE(class->fields->next,
> &f->link); (4)
> list_for_each_entry(field,
> &class->fields, link)
> -> field = class->fields->next
> = &f->link
> = f (offset 0)
> -> arm64 weak ordering:
> (4) visible before (2)
> field->link.next == 0
> -> next iteration:
> field = (void *)0 = NULL
> -> crash at NULL->type (0x18)
>
> This produces the following panic:
> Unable to handle kernel access ... at virtual address 0000000000000018
> pc : update_event_fields+0xf8/0x368
> Call trace:
> update_event_fields+0xf8/0x368
> trace_event_update_all+0x7c/0x2b4
> trace_module_notify+0x4c/0x1dc
> notifier_call_chain+0x84/0x168
> blocking_notifier_call_chain_robust+0x64/0xd4
> load_module+0x10c8/0x123c
> __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x230/0x31c
>
> Fix by taking event_mutex in trace_event_update_all() before
> trace_event_sem.
>
> Fixes: b3bc8547d3be ("tracing: Have TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM affect trace event types as well")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Michael Wu <michael@allwinnertech.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-10 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-10 6:32 [PATCH v5] tracing: Fix race between update_event_fields and, event_define_fields Michael Wu
2026-08-10 14:45 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260810104525.6a3a2e6c@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=michael@allwinnertech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox