From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hui Su" <sh_def@163.com>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Fix crash passing ERR_PTR to kthread_stop()
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2026 19:10:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260815191034.82D8F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260815190151.568893-4-sh_def@163.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Silent Test Bypass
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] tracing: Fix crash passing ERR_PTR to kthread_stop() ---
commit 40985725587eec80dcbbfbf251d18cd9797fe26c
Author: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
tracing: Fix crash passing ERR_PTR to kthread_stop()
event_test_stuff() calls kthread_run() and unconditionally passes the
returned task_struct pointer to kthread_stop(). kthread_run() returns an
error pointer such as ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) when kthread creation fails, for
example under memory pressure during the boot-time event self-test.
kthread_stop() then dereferences the invalid pointer, crashing the
kernel.
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> index 0356cae0cf74e..207f47f54dbbf 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> @@ -3866,6 +3866,8 @@ static __init void event_test_stuff(void)
> struct task_struct *test_thread;
>
> test_thread = kthread_run(event_test_thread, NULL, "test-events");
> + if (IS_ERR(test_thread))
> + return;
[Severity: Medium]
Does returning silently here cause the self-test framework to falsely report
success when the workload thread cannot be created?
The caller event_trace_self_tests() unconditionally prints "OK" after calling
this function:
kernel/trace/trace_events.c:event_trace_self_tests() {
...
ftrace_event_enable_disable(file, 1);
event_test_stuff();
ftrace_event_enable_disable(file, 0);
pr_cont("OK\n");
}
...
}
Should event_test_stuff() propagate the error so that the caller can correctly
report the test failure or skip it appropriately?
> msleep(1);
> kthread_stop(test_thread);
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260815190151.568893-4-sh_def@163.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-15 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-15 19:01 [PATCH] tracing: Fix crash passing ERR_PTR to kthread_stop() Hui Su
2026-08-15 19:10 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-16 23:15 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260815191034.82D8F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sh_def@163.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox