From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Vincent Donnefort" <vdonnefort@google.com>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] ring-buffer: Prevent truncation of nr_pages / nr_subbufs
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:59:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260817135906.481481F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260817134750.3909384-4-vdonnefort@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Integer underflow in alloc_buffer() for mapped ring buffers leads to memory corruption on 32-bit systems.
- [High] Out-of-bounds memory corruption in rb_cpu_meta_valid during ring buffer boot meta validation due to unvalidated meta->nr_subbufs.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v7 3/3] ring-buffer: Prevent truncation of nr_pages / nr_subbufs ---
commit ca74d5f745c91c8b4a7ee42fae91ab814132919c
Author: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
ring-buffer: Prevent truncation of nr_pages / nr_subbufs
This commit prevents truncation operations on large ring buffers by changing
nr_pages and nr_subbufs definitions to unsigned long. It also upgrades
subbuf_size to unsigned int.
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1849,13 +1848,13 @@ static bool rb_meta_init(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int scratch_size)
> * must be the same.
> */
> static bool rb_cpu_meta_valid(struct ring_buffer_cpu_meta *meta, int cpu,
> - struct trace_buffer *buffer, int nr_pages,
> + struct trace_buffer *buffer, unsigned long nr_pages,
> unsigned long *subbuf_mask)
> {
> - int subbuf_size = PAGE_SIZE;
> + unsigned long subbuf_size = PAGE_SIZE;
> unsigned long buffers_start;
> unsigned long buffers_end;
> - int i;
> + unsigned long i;
>
> if (!subbuf_mask)
> return false;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this lead to an out-of-bounds memory
overwrite on the kernel heap?
In rb_range_meta_init(), subbuf_mask is allocated using the current boot's
nr_pages + 1:
subbuf_mask = bitmap_alloc(nr_pages + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
However, later in rb_cpu_meta_valid(), the legacy persistent metadata is used
to clear and set bits in this mask:
bitmap_clear(subbuf_mask, 0, meta->nr_subbufs);
...
for (i = 0; i < meta->nr_subbufs; i++) {
...
set_bit(meta->buffers[i], subbuf_mask);
}
If the system boots with more CPUs than the previous cycle, the per-CPU
nr_pages constraint decreases. Consequently, the legacy meta->nr_subbufs
could be larger than the newly allocated subbuf_mask, causing bitmap_clear()
and set_bit() to overflow the allocation.
[ ... ]
> @@ -2782,8 +2782,8 @@ static struct trace_buffer *alloc_buffer(unsigned long size, unsigned flags,
> struct ring_buffer_remote *remote)
> {
> struct trace_buffer *buffer __free(kfree) = NULL;
> - long nr_pages;
> - int subbuf_size;
> + unsigned int subbuf_size;
> + unsigned long nr_pages;
> int bsize;
> int cpu;
> int ret;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this function suffer from an integer
underflow that could bypass length boundary validations?
Further down in alloc_buffer(), when calculating the per-CPU size for mapped
buffers:
size = end - buffers_start;
size = size / nr_cpu_ids;
nr_pages = (size - sizeof(struct ring_buffer_cpu_meta)) /
(subbuf_size + sizeof(int));
If the user-provided mapped range is smaller than the meta structure size,
size - sizeof(struct ring_buffer_cpu_meta) will underflow. On 32-bit systems,
this yields a massive nr_pages value that successfully passes the
rb_static_max_pages() threshold check.
The subsequently calculated pointers will wrap around the 32-bit address
space, defeating the bounds check against the end boundary, and allowing
mapped metadata structures to be written into arbitrary out-of-bounds memory.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260817134750.3909384-1-vdonnefort@google.com?part=3
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-17 13:47 [PATCH v7 0/3] ring-buffer: Fixes for subbuf resizing and persistent buffers Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-17 13:47 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] tracing: Fix subbuf resize races with trace_pipe_raw readers Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-17 14:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 13:47 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] ring-buffer: Cap static ring buffer nr_pages Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-17 14:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 13:47 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] ring-buffer: Prevent truncation of nr_pages / nr_subbufs Vincent Donnefort
2026-08-17 13:59 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260817135906.481481F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox