From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: wen.yang@linux.dev
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] selftests/ftrace: Walk up to find test.d/functions when a subdirectory is passed
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 18:31:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260819183133.5EE301F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7808194405719fd0ae7b0bcf4301c5902eb31929.1787161646.git.wen.yang@linux.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Local Privilege Escalation via untrusted directory traversal when implicitly sourcing test.d/functions.
- [Medium] Infinite loop in directory traversal when testing top-level directories due to POSIX 'dirname' behavior with double slashes.
--
--- Patch [9]: [PATCH v5 9/9] selftests/ftrace: Walk up to find test.d/functions when a subdirectory is passed ---
commit 982c65a7f93c6d254f86b734c29fd401b0e3707a
Author: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>
selftests/ftrace: Walk up to find test.d/functions when a subdirectory is passed
When a test directory that does not itself contain test.d/functions is
passed to ftracetest (e.g. verification/test.d/tlob/), ftracetest fell
back to its own functions file and lost the rv-specific check_requires
handling for ':monitor' and ':reactor' requirements.
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest
> index 0a56bf209f6c0..3ba929820dd2c 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest
> @@ -159,9 +159,20 @@ parse_opts() { # opts
> if [ -n "$OPT_TEST_CASES" ]; then
> TEST_CASES=$OPT_TEST_CASES
> fi
> - if [ -n "$OPT_TEST_DIR" -a -f "$OPT_TEST_DIR"/test.d/functions ]; then
> - TOP_DIR=$OPT_TEST_DIR
> - TEST_DIR=$TOP_DIR/test.d
> + if [ -n "$OPT_TEST_DIR" ]; then
> + # Walk up from OPT_TEST_DIR to find the nearest ancestor that contains
> + # test.d/functions. This allows a monitor subdirectory (e.g.
> + # verification/test.d/tlob/) to be passed directly without placing a
> + # dummy functions shim in each new subdirectory.
> + dir=$OPT_TEST_DIR
> + while [ "$dir" != "/" ]; do
[Severity: Medium]
Can this loop run indefinitely if a user passes a directory directly under
the root, like /tmp?
If the path is formatted as //tmp, GNU dirname preserves double leading
slashes because it treats them as POSIX UNC paths. If dir starts as //tmp,
dirname "$dir" evaluates to //, and the loop condition [ "$dir" != "/" ]
will evaluate to true infinitely, causing the test script to hang.
> + if [ -f "$dir/test.d/functions" ]; then
> + TOP_DIR=$dir
> + TEST_DIR=$TOP_DIR/test.d
> + break
> + fi
[Severity: High]
Could this directory traversal lead to arbitrary code execution if the path
walks back through a world-writable directory?
If ftracetest is run as root on a trusted directory inside a path like
/tmp/legitimate_tests/, the loop will traverse up to /tmp and search for
/tmp/test.d/functions.
An unprivileged attacker could preemptively plant a malicious script at
that location. The script would then be found, and since the ftracetest
script later sources this file, it would execute the attacker's code with
root privileges.
> + dir=$(dirname "$dir")
> + done
> + fi
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1787161646.git.wen.yang@linux.dev?part=9
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-19 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-19 18:15 [PATCH v5 0/9] rv: Add task latency over budget RV monitor wen.yang
2026-08-19 18:15 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] rv: Introduce DA_MON_ALLOCATION_STRATEGY wen.yang
2026-08-19 18:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 18:15 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] rv: Add generic uprobe infrastructure for RV monitors wen.yang
2026-08-19 18:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 18:15 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] rv: Add tlob model DOT file wen.yang
2026-08-19 18:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 18:15 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] rv: Fix ha_invariant_passed_ns silent bypass of invariant check wen.yang
2026-08-19 18:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 18:15 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] rv: Make da_monitor_reset_hook and EVENT_NONE_LBL overridable wen.yang
2026-08-19 18:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 18:15 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] rv: Add tlob hybrid automaton monitor wen.yang
2026-08-19 18:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 18:15 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] rv: Add KUnit tests for the tlob monitor wen.yang
2026-08-19 18:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 18:15 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] selftests/verification: Add tlob selftests wen.yang
2026-08-19 18:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 18:15 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] selftests/ftrace: Walk up to find test.d/functions when a subdirectory is passed wen.yang
2026-08-19 18:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260819183133.5EE301F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wen.yang@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox