Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] ntfs3: add iomap tracepoints

[sashiko-bot@kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Data truncation of 64-bit inode number to 32-bit unsigned long in trace events on 32-bit architectures.
--

--- Patch [6]: [PATCH v4 6/7] ntfs3: add iomap tracepoints ---
commit 6e265a35dba7936f19ebddff3d05806b6ce60f0a
Author: Baolin Liu <liubaolin@kylinos.cn>

ntfs3: add iomap tracepoints

This commit adds trace events for ntfs_iomap_begin() and ntfs_iomap_end()
to help observe iomap mapping activity.

> diff --git a/include/trace/events/ntfs3.h b/include/trace/events/ntfs3.h
> index e39765bc062f1..e0c0c44ce318f 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/ntfs3.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/ntfs3.h
[ ... ]
> +TRACE_EVENT(ntfs3_iomap_begin,
> +	TP_PROTO(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,
> +		 unsigned int flags),
> +	TP_ARGS(inode, offset, length, flags),
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__field(unsigned long, ino)

[Severity: Low]
Is unsigned long wide enough for the inode number here? In struct inode,
i_ino is defined as a u64. On 32-bit architectures, won't assigning
inode->i_ino to an unsigned long silently truncate high inode numbers?
Could this be changed to use u64 instead?

> +		__field(loff_t, offset)
> +		__field(loff_t, length)
> +		__field(dev_t, dev)
> +		__field(unsigned int, flags)
> +	),
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__entry->ino = inode->i_ino;
[ ... ]
> +TRACE_EVENT(ntfs3_iomap_end,
> +	TP_PROTO(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length,
> +		 ssize_t written, unsigned int flags),
> +	TP_ARGS(inode, pos, length, written, flags),
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__field(unsigned long, ino)

[Severity: Low]
Does this field also risk truncating the u64 inode->i_ino when running on
32-bit architectures?

> +		__field(loff_t, pos)
> +		__field(loff_t, length)
> +		__field(ssize_t, written)
> +		__field(dev_t, dev)
> +		__field(unsigned int, flags)
> +	),
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__entry->ino = inode->i_ino;
[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260820090504.950475-1-liubaolin12138@163.com?part=6