Linux Trace Kernel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: wen.yang@linux.dev
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 9/9] selftests/ftrace: Walk up to find test.d/functions when a subdirectory is passed
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 16:58:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260820165819.5CCC71F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dc58717cc225389b041dc36c684df23e3253c473.1787243842.git.wen.yang@linux.dev>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The directory traversal logic fails to check directory ownership and fails open on `stat` error, allowing arbitrary code execution as root via an attacker-controlled ancestor directory.
--

--- Patch [9]: [PATCH v6 9/9] selftests/ftrace: Walk up to find test.d/functions when a subdirectory is passed ---
commit 71305ea3fc4b8a7294d098d4bcdd8624fd21ca70
Author: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>

selftests/ftrace: Walk up to find test.d/functions when a subdirectory is passed

This commit modifies ftracetest to walk up the directory tree from a passed
test directory until it finds a test.d/functions file. This allows monitor
subdirectories to be used directly as the test root without needing dummy
functions shims.

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest
> index 0a56bf209f6c0..8f9d9291bf4ce 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/ftracetest

[ ... ]

> @@ -159,9 +159,29 @@ parse_opts() { # opts
>    if [ -n "$OPT_TEST_CASES" ]; then
>      TEST_CASES=$OPT_TEST_CASES
>    fi
> -  if [ -n "$OPT_TEST_DIR" -a -f "$OPT_TEST_DIR"/test.d/functions ]; then
> -    TOP_DIR=$OPT_TEST_DIR
> -    TEST_DIR=$TOP_DIR/test.d
> +  if [ -n "$OPT_TEST_DIR" ]; then
> +    # Walk up from OPT_TEST_DIR to find the nearest ancestor that contains
> +    # test.d/functions.  This allows a monitor subdirectory (e.g.
> +    # verification/test.d/tlob/) to be passed directly without placing a
> +    # dummy functions shim in each new subdirectory.
> +    # Security: only walk within directories owned by root or the current user
> +    # to prevent sourcing a functions file planted in a world-writable ancestor.
> +    dir=$(realpath "$OPT_TEST_DIR" 2>/dev/null || echo "$OPT_TEST_DIR")
> +    while [ "$dir" != "/" ] && [ "$dir" != "//" ]; do
> +      if [ -f "$dir/test.d/functions" ]; then
> +        # Verify the directory is not world-writable to prevent LPE.
> +        dirperms=$(stat -c "%a" "$dir" 2>/dev/null || stat -f "%Lp" "$dir" 2>/dev/null)
> +        case "$dirperms" in
> +          *2|*3|*6|*7) ;; # world-writable: skip this candidate
> +          *)
> +            TOP_DIR=$dir

[Severity: High]
Does this logic actually check directory ownership as mentioned in the comments?

It appears the code only checks if the directory is world-writable, but omits
validating that it is owned by root or the current user. An attacker could
potentially create a directory with standard 0755 permissions, plant a
malicious test.d/functions script, and if a privileged user or automated test
harness runs ftracetest against a subdirectory, the script would traverse up
and source the payload.

Additionally, if the stat command fails for any reason, dirperms will be empty.
Would an empty string match the *) fallback case and cause the script to silently
fail open, accepting even a world-writable directory?

> +            TEST_DIR=$TOP_DIR/test.d
> +            break
> +            ;;
> +        esac
> +      fi
> +      dir=$(dirname "$dir")
> +    done
>    fi
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1787243842.git.wen.yang@linux.dev?part=9

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-20 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-20 16:45 [PATCH v6 0/9] rv: Add task latency over budget RV monitor wen.yang
2026-08-20 16:45 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] rv: Introduce DA_MON_ALLOCATION_STRATEGY wen.yang
2026-08-20 16:45 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] rv: Add generic uprobe infrastructure for RV monitors wen.yang
2026-08-20 16:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 16:45 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] rv: Add tlob model DOT file wen.yang
2026-08-20 16:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 16:45 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] rv: Fix ha_invariant_passed_ns silent bypass of invariant check wen.yang
2026-08-20 16:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 16:45 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] rv: Make da_monitor_reset_hook and EVENT_NONE_LBL overridable wen.yang
2026-08-20 16:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 16:45 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] rv: Add tlob hybrid automaton monitor wen.yang
2026-08-20 17:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 16:45 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] rv: Add KUnit tests for the tlob monitor wen.yang
2026-08-20 16:45 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] selftests/verification: Add tlob selftests wen.yang
2026-08-20 16:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 16:45 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] selftests/ftrace: Walk up to find test.d/functions when a subdirectory is passed wen.yang
2026-08-20 16:58   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260820165819.5CCC71F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=wen.yang@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox