From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Crystal Wood" <crwood@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] tracing/osnoise: Take trace_types_lock in timerlat_fd_open
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 21:24:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260824212440.A99C01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824211544.3984835-5-crwood@redhat.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Low] Mixing `goto`-based error handling with scope-based `guard()` cleanup in `timerlat_fd_open()`.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Uninitialized per-CPU mutex and CPU ID for hotplugged CPUs in `init_osnoise_tracer()`.
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH 4/4] tracing/osnoise: Take trace_types_lock in timerlat_fd_open ---
commit d0fbb203fad6d30d667803da9a34c6adb7c10f72
Author: Crystal Wood <crwood@redhat.com>
tracing/osnoise: Take trace_types_lock in timerlat_fd_open
This commit replaces the use of interface_lock with trace_types_lock using
a guard(mutex) in timerlat_fd_open. It prevents a user fd from being opened
when osnoise_options_write has already stopped threads but not yet set
OSN_WORKLOAD.
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c b/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c
> index 0f27af6ade3e1..3d12ce8a591e7 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c
> @@ -2466,16 +2466,14 @@ static int timerlat_fd_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> long cpu = (long) inode->i_cdev;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - mutex_lock(&interface_lock);
> + guard(mutex)(&trace_types_lock);
[Severity: Low]
Does this mix goto-based error handling with scope-based guard cleanup?
The function still relies on a goto err; block for error handling (which
unlocks osn_var->lock and calls migrate_enable()), but it now uses guard
for trace_types_lock.
The cleanup guidelines suggest converting all resources to scope-based
cleanup, or none of them, to avoid mixing semantics and ownership rules
in the same routine.
[ ... ]
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does init_osnoise_tracer fail to
initialize per-CPU data for hotplugged CPUs?
Looking at init_osnoise_tracer in kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c:
kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c:init_osnoise_tracer() {
...
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
struct osnoise_variables *osn = cpu_osn_var(cpu);
mutex_init(&osn->lock);
osn->cpu = cpu;
}
...
}
Because this iterates over online CPUs rather than possible CPUs, if a CPU
is offline during boot or hot-added later, its mutex and cpu ID will remain
uninitialized.
When that CPU comes online, osnoise_hotplug_workfn calls start_kthread(cpu),
which attempts to lock the uninitialized osn->lock. Could this cause a
lockdep warning or kernel crash due to uninitialized list_head pointers?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260824211544.3984835-1-crwood@redhat.com?part=4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 21:15 [PATCH 0/4] tracing/osnoise: Synchronization fixes Crystal Wood
2026-08-24 21:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] tracing/osnoise: Per-cpu mutex and fd detachment Crystal Wood
2026-08-24 21:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 21:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] tracing/osnoise: timerlat_main: Disable migration before per-cpu access Crystal Wood
2026-08-24 21:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 21:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] tracing/osnoise: start_kthread: Always check OSN_WORKLOAD Crystal Wood
2026-08-24 21:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] tracing/osnoise: Take trace_types_lock in timerlat_fd_open Crystal Wood
2026-08-24 21:24 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260824212440.A99C01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=crwood@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox