From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Haotian Zhang" <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] samples/ftrace: Fix kthread_stop() on ERR_PTR in ftrace-direct-multi-modify
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 02:00:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260826020014.EBDA81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826015050.10772-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The patch fixes an invalid pointer dereference resulting from a kthread_run() failure in ftrace-direct-multi-modify.c, but leaves the identical vulnerability unpatched in ftrace-direct-modify.c.
--
commit 7f181703b20421e482d5701113538a5a801d8141
Author: Haotian Zhang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
samples/ftrace: Fix kthread_stop() on ERR_PTR in ftrace-direct-multi-modify
This commit fixes a bug in ftrace-direct-multi-modify.c where a failed
kthread_run() returns an error pointer that is later passed to kthread_stop()
during module unload. It adds proper error handling to unregister the direct
call and propagate the error.
> diff --git a/samples/ftrace/ftrace-direct-multi-modify.c b/samples/ftrace/ftrace-direct-multi-modify.c
> --- a/samples/ftrace/ftrace-direct-multi-modify.c
> +++ b/samples/ftrace/ftrace-direct-multi-modify.c
> @@ -364,9 +364,15 @@ static int __init ftrace_direct_multi_init(void)
>
> ret = register_ftrace_direct(&direct, my_tramp);
>
> - if (!ret)
> - simple_tsk = kthread_run(simple_thread, NULL, "event-sample-fn");
> - return ret;
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + simple_tsk = kthread_run(simple_thread, NULL, "event-sample-fn");
> + if (IS_ERR(simple_tsk)) {
> + unregister_ftrace_direct(&direct, my_tramp, true);
> + return PTR_ERR(simple_tsk);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does
samples/ftrace/ftrace-direct-modify.c also need this exact same fix?
Looking at ftrace_direct_init() in samples/ftrace/ftrace-direct-modify.c, it
contains the identical unpatched pattern:
if (!ret)
simple_tsk = kthread_run(simple_thread, NULL, "event-sample-fn");
return ret;
If kthread_run() fails under memory pressure, it returns an ERR_PTR. Because
the preceding ret is 0, the initialization function still returns success,
causing the module to load with simple_tsk holding an error pointer.
When the module is unloaded, ftrace_direct_exit() will pass this ERR_PTR
directly to kthread_stop(), which can result in an invalid pointer
dereference and oops the kernel.
Should this same error handling update be applied to ftrace-direct-modify.c?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260826015050.10772-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-26 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 1:50 [PATCH v2] samples/ftrace: Fix kthread_stop() on ERR_PTR in ftrace-direct-multi-modify Haotian Zhang
2026-08-26 2:00 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260826020014.EBDA81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vulab@iscas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox