From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA38723BCEE; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 12:41:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787834483; cv=none; b=uVv5TKKd7oMU5SR7VFCSQKUDbvtW7Q1+KdrJdZyuPotyUyPbuMwr8NV87DaU6Ks0/6VIKCWCivgBq9FOSSZABn6zUKyJ7zkjNnZ0SkszTmLxu65rl1SJHgOTry7YIwybrCCaFBo88JF8VS0tpBHWdu4pSWsxewWG4FWW0ucFUAs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787834483; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AYLnfhHHeqd95bsgIutEAxRxecIAQZYovjUbRBUPbPM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XvU6aCCHj+RI18pruyMWbq2Ry+ybeu2mMHOGkSykqJRf4aE21qRWa1TXP7k9PdZnwRykeTK+XlMWaljdFronVmb+LY8oaRlyO5PctqSGVA0J3IIlFcIkLG81A/ikpLm5Yw1jdbQAie5gHFlUMFnoA+jIdwWu0f21eems7boaklM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=goodmis.org header.i=@goodmis.org header.b=mYYqiuNl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=goodmis.org header.i=@goodmis.org header.b="mYYqiuNl" Received: from omf16.hostedemail.com (lb01a-stub [10.200.18.249]) by unirelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A378A3C27; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 12:41:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: rostedt@goodmis.org) by omf16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 61E9320013; Thu, 27 Aug 2026 12:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 08:42:05 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsOpbXk=?= Jean Cc: Bradley Morgan , mhiramat@kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing/user_events: Clear copied tracing state before fork duplication Message-ID: <20260827084205.776f7cb7@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <3beb0339407a35c0b995856eae74d870@oss.cyber.gouv.fr> References: <20260826214414.1971632-2-Jeremy.Jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr> <20260827080839.35e44d04@gandalf.local.home> <20260827081915.320fe2c3@gandalf.local.home> <3beb0339407a35c0b995856eae74d870@oss.cyber.gouv.fr> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.20.0git84 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Stat-Signature: ggzpphufcf3p435khx4uxd6hb1zzymt1 X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout08 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 61E9320013 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX19YSHo9eWZBq40qy4Afec5+DmxVpZiQdqE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=goodmis.org; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=dkim1; bh=AYLnfhHHeqd95bsgIutEAxRxecIAQZYovjUbRBUPbPM=; b=mYYqiuNlY4J2Pa7pOSbDQSQ0J2e6Q9zmG+saYDa7ImavWlz+CQ+Rw1SBdJnje1CddiLnuTkLvJNcHc/s9UA7R5Xg6S7SUOKTRmA/A9k2GwqSCWGlUNvgCvevTIsPaVXH5xNxPoTYy1lBtXf7yiwUfOjPCqAmcfvIW0FYPqednFQ= X-HE-Tag: 1787834478-918267 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX19rrap3+extfATw51zC1sd35BXY/S9Rr4Mp8qdBtlpEVwQ57yd4AOxkpiKn1FKyiKs7ZYGcKH57iwwF+T4OA21UUmKvryPf2frgKdmQG+fTO4eL/8YaZ+JorQNg0lxmhXMRTKSnoV4NzK2d4fAgvKTmJ9lwzFu+h90zVur5e894QRn/RQJ1fqVo2tXZalebq8nsKTjrZrk6MBYRWm43rqWWWXrGLZ548Z13zpXpKnmImQKVP5djQenxMo8m838aKN2bM9UtICndFYNcktj5mOtg8Nb0FJb2wKlvnvnYyRTzYPCemURjTWmR On Thu, 27 Aug 2026 14:27:44 +0200 J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my Jean wrote: > Thanks for this. I thought that my previous version was okay > so that it was not required to read the details of > user_event_mm_alloc() to get convinced whether user_event_mm is > accessed or not, but it's true that in the end, this is not > required. Your fix is simpler. Do you want me to send a v3 > with that simplification and the same changelog as in the v2? Yes, please send a v3. Thanks, -- Steve