From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 05/14] x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 14:38:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260830143849.070271F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <178810006604.64882.2095793023976981357.stgit@devnote2>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Modifying a debug address register without first disabling the corresponding breakpoint in DR7 violates the x86 hardware architecture specification and causes unpredictable behavior.
--
commit 35b07811f48c348c13ac1d9de7fa44d25fc7f36a
Author: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API
This commit adds an architecture backend to modify the address of an active
per-CPU watchpoint without releasing its hardware slot. It validates the new
address, finds the installed local slot, and updates the hardware debug
register and per-CPU shadow state.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/59637b96946653393a7ad3c7de094094796b39c2.1785067572.git.wangjinchao600@gmail.com/
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> index 3204e75dc4546..2227918b0163c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
[ ... ]
> +int arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr(struct perf_event *bp,
> + unsigned long addr)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + do {
> + seq = this_cpu_inc_return(cpu_dr7_seq);
> + this_cpu_write(cpu_debugreg[i], addr);
> + barrier();
> + set_debugreg(addr, i);
[Severity: High]
Does this code risk violating the x86 hardware architecture specification?
Looking at arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() in
arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c, set_debugreg() directly updates the debug
address register (DR0-DR3) while its corresponding enable bit in DR7 might
still be set.
According to hardware specs, modifying a debug address register without first
disabling the breakpoint in DR7 can lead to spurious debug exceptions or
unpredictable processor behavior if an NMI occurs or if execution boundaries
trigger a match on the transient state.
Should the DR7 enable bit be cleared before updating the debug register?
> + barrier();
> + } while (seq != this_cpu_read(cpu_dr7_seq));
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/178810001186.64882.2161016469449127450.stgit@devnote2?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-30 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-30 14:26 [PATCH v14 00/14] tracing: wprobe: x86: Add wprobe for watchpoint Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-30 14:27 ` [PATCH v14 01/14] x86/mce: Fix hardware debug register corruption on task migration Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-30 14:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 14:27 ` [PATCH v14 02/14] tracing/probes: Fix BTF kflag check for anonymous struct member access Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-30 14:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 1:24 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-08-30 14:27 ` [PATCH v14 03/14] kprobes: Protect kprobe_blacklist with RCU Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-30 14:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 1:30 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-08-30 14:27 ` [PATCH v14 04/14] x86/hw_breakpoints: Make DR7 updates NMI safe Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-30 14:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 14:27 ` [PATCH v14 05/14] x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-30 14:38 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-30 14:27 ` [PATCH v14 06/14] HWBP: Add modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-30 14:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v14 07/14] tracing/wprobe: Add wprobe (watchpoint probe) trace event support Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-30 14:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v14 08/14] x86: hw_breakpoint: Add a kconfig to clarify when a breakpoint fires Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-30 14:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v14 09/14] selftests: tracing: Add a basic testcase for wprobe Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-30 14:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v14 10/14] selftests: tracing: Add syntax " Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-30 14:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v14 11/14] tracing/wprobe: Add set_wprobe and clear_wprobe event triggers Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-30 14:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 14:29 ` [PATCH v14 12/14] selftests: ftrace: Add wprobe trigger testcase Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-30 14:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 14:29 ` [PATCH v14 13/14] tracing/wprobe: Support BTF typecast in fetchargs Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-30 14:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 14:29 ` [PATCH v14 14/14] tracing/wprobe: Support BTF struct offset resolution in set_wprobe trigger Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-30 14:46 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260830143849.070271F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox