From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB75E48381D; Thu, 3 Sep 2026 10:35:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788431732; cv=none; b=pAKeZn/tNnOcBmuStTG2Ufxlyj+M9Q0q9kG6ZCCvzlTqu8Y137FnRcLBtp0PtrTU/MTtLagYydz5rDBbFXEWm8MyhQusJYv3Xaa9k8x6cb5eBrC4hzSburpEQ3h3xOHcI8snb4TABgBnrMGRLzXuptc7xXwM2EgtMRycmBhlG2s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788431732; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oupvZIQLRj2F8pwTGPPDeOgOmjETvsOL7Smn8U24vK4=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=Xq3DFFytKhKFFt4QAAfwhNPnNTdOFi9iWdw6VwyyECqpuG6hX+D+AFC/xkRCmANa4yjf2CO1OSQ2gFCW/xvyRoHHuBAv818AQ794KHB2i9QVEIC2ylY5ihvNd24f3TGoHsTHhcjqzI7vvioU7Ac5VUmfCNJIoxUNDyoZdSKINAE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Hvl8VNPz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Hvl8VNPz" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A06971F00A3D; Thu, 3 Sep 2026 10:35:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788431722; bh=oupvZIQLRj2F8pwTGPPDeOgOmjETvsOL7Smn8U24vK4=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=Hvl8VNPzvhooruZwipX6WzNUkFFm/74nfalux8huERIDwn31oavj0fOD2RPJntxJc gDipr9gn95yhIILgLp8MYQM1fB0jKwMWAl8q/iu1ab+IhFJELc2TLY6qEw6iiKODGo c6uLwt+wogqGTOWkxp0nUde21vklI29KvilJPZh90knTaHzTEqQtUJP42pddlwVqLD KnSVvMeYHqRWbKaad4sV7+AJ4ekNqd1PKAQfrkw3u21et7bDNnyG2goL/ehRv0nc+D k8wTfNJ5VCmwlSN7WilzGLnj716b5S5WBPosLIqBOpa1sAiFrfsQBUVJ9BzBB7FtAO Y3vURHxFO5Sjg== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] mm: rename pointers to software PTE values as ptentp Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Muhammad Usama Anjum" Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260903103002.1091859-3-usama.anjum@arm.com> References: <20260903103002.1091859-1-usama.anjum@arm.com> <20260903103002.1091859-3-usama.anjum@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 10:35:21 +0000 Message-Id: <20260903103521.A06971F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Some interfaces use pte_t * for a software PTE value rather than for an > entry stored in a PTE table. These pointers must remain pte_t * when > pointers to PTE table storage are converted to hw_pte_t *. >=20 > Rename these parameters in the install_pte callback, > write_protect_page(), and guard_install_set_pte() to ptentp. The later > Coccinelle conversion skips pointers named ptentp, allowing it to convert > the remaining PTE table pointers without changing these interfaces. >=20 > Some functions already use ptentp for such pointers, including: > - madvise_folio_pte_batch() > - folio_pte_batch_flags() > No need to rename them. >=20 > This patch only renames parameters and makes no functional change. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260903103002.1091= 859-1-usama.anjum@arm.com?part=3D2