From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Donggeun Yoo" <donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: hist: free the var ref when its initialization fails
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2026 13:45:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260906134553.71E331F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260906133352.3815019-1-donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Pre-existing memory leak in `__destroy_hist_field()` for variable references (`VAR_REF` fields) reused three or more times within a histogram trigger.
--
commit e42abc814ef3aa510a981868dbef3bcabc30250f
Author: Donggeun Yoo <donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com>
tracing: hist: free the var ref when its initialization fails
This commit fixes a memory leak in create_var_ref() when init_var_ref()
fails. It modifies the error path to call __destroy_hist_field() directly,
ensuring the VAR_REF hist_field is freed without checking flags.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20260906124025.3550596-1-donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com/
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> index 963e0d6b61fdf..34831a01bb9b5 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> @@ -2234,7 +2234,7 @@ static struct hist_field *create_var_ref(struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data,
> ref_field = create_hist_field(var_field->hist_data, NULL, flags, NULL);
> if (ref_field) {
> if (init_var_ref(ref_field, var_field, system, event_name)) {
> - destroy_hist_field(ref_field, 0);
> + __destroy_hist_field(ref_field);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the reference counting
logic for VAR_REF fields lead to a permanent memory leak when a variable
is referenced three or more times?
When a tracefs user creates a histogram trigger where a variable is
referenced multiple times (for example:
delta=common_timestamp-$start,delta2=common_timestamp-$start,
delta3=common_timestamp-$start), create_var_ref() increments the reference
count for each reuse:
kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c:create_var_ref() {
...
for (i = 0; i < hist_data->n_var_refs; i++) {
ref_field = hist_data->var_refs[i];
if (ref_field->var.idx == var_field->var.idx &&
ref_field->var.hist_data == var_field->hist_data) {
get_hist_field(ref_field);
return ref_field;
}
}
...
}
During normal trigger destruction, destroy_hist_fields() visits each unique
variable reference in the var_refs[] array exactly once:
kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c:destroy_hist_fields() {
...
for (i = 0; i < hist_data->n_var_refs; i++) {
...
__destroy_hist_field(hist_data->var_refs[i]);
}
...
}
Since destroy_hist_fields() only calls __destroy_hist_field() once per
unique var_ref regardless of how many times it was referenced, the
reference count is only decremented by one. If the initial count was 3
or more, the decrement check in __destroy_hist_field() evaluates to
true and returns early without freeing the struct hist_field memory:
kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c:__destroy_hist_field() {
if (--hist_field->ref > 1)
return;
...
kfree(hist_field);
}
Could this allow a user with tracefs access to repeatedly create and destroy
such triggers, leading to memory exhaustion?
> return NULL;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260906133352.3815019-1-donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-06 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-06 13:33 [PATCH] tracing: hist: free the var ref when its initialization fails Donggeun Yoo
2026-09-06 13:45 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-06 13:51 ` Donggeun Yoo
2026-09-10 1:10 ` Donggeun Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260906134553.71E331F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox