From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bootconfig: remove unreachable index checks in xbc_verify_tree()
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 10:46:29 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260908104629.e7a85a90e376b843dbc51dc7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260905141637.1547429-1-ekffu200098@gmail.com>
On Sat, 5 Sep 2026 23:16:36 +0900
Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com> wrote:
> xbc_verify_tree() checks that every node's next and child are below
> xbc_node_num. Both fields store the index of an existing node, which
> is below xbc_node_num.
This is a kind of foolpoof/defensive checking. (so I call it verify.)
>
> So remove the checks.
>
> No functional change.
Hmm, OK, I think we should decouple the logic/implementation
verification from runtime verification (e.g. wrong format)
and move the former to tools/bootconfig.
Thank you,
>
> Signed-off-by: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>
> ---
> lib/bootconfig.c | 13 +------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/bootconfig.c b/lib/bootconfig.c
> index 89c88e359179..d383430637ee 100644
> --- a/lib/bootconfig.c
> +++ b/lib/bootconfig.c
> @@ -1005,7 +1005,7 @@ static int __init xbc_close_brace(char **k, char *n)
>
> static int __init xbc_verify_tree(void)
> {
> - int i, depth;
> + int depth;
> size_t len, wlen;
> struct xbc_node *n, *m;
>
> @@ -1022,17 +1022,6 @@ static int __init xbc_verify_tree(void)
> return -ENOENT;
> }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < xbc_node_num; i++) {
> - if (xbc_nodes[i].next >= xbc_node_num) {
> - return xbc_parse_error("No closing brace",
> - xbc_node_get_data(xbc_nodes + i));
> - }
> - if (xbc_nodes[i].child >= xbc_node_num) {
> - return xbc_parse_error("Broken child node",
> - xbc_node_get_data(xbc_nodes + i));
> - }
> - }
> -
> /* Key tree limitation check */
> n = &xbc_nodes[0];
> depth = 1;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-05 14:16 [PATCH] bootconfig: remove unreachable index checks in xbc_verify_tree() Sang-Heon Jeon
2026-09-08 1:46 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2026-09-08 15:34 ` Sang-Heon Jeon
2026-09-08 23:24 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-09-09 1:27 ` Sang-Heon Jeon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260908104629.e7a85a90e376b843dbc51dc7@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ekffu200098@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox