Linux Trace Kernel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ali Ahmet Memiş" <aliamemis@disroot.org>
Cc: "Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Don't dereference trace_event_file in deferred trigger free
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:24:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911162441.D00B81F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911155650.354844-1-aliamemis@disroot.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] trace_event_file UAF and trigger memory leak on module unload
--

commit a41f148580cfeaf3b10b318f7d55d016bb4307cc
Author: Ali Ahmet Memiş <aliamemis@disroot.org>

tracing: Don't dereference trace_event_file in deferred trigger free

This commit addresses a use-after-free by avoiding the dereference of
trace_event_file during a deferred trigger free. It does so by directly
keeping the trace_event_call in the enable_trigger_data structure.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260828134340.2501683A24-agordeev@linux.ibm.com/

> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
> index 5e76f94e7a80e..0e4baecc7c737 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
> @@ -1952,6 +1952,7 @@ struct event_trigger_data {
>  
>  struct enable_trigger_data {
>  	struct trace_event_file		*file;
> +	struct trace_event_call		*call;
>  	bool				enable;
>  	bool				hist;
>  };
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> index 149300cc5e8ad..4d2fde996c0f6 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> @@ -1728,7 +1728,8 @@ static void enable_trigger_private_data_free(struct event_trigger_data *data)
>  {
>  	struct enable_trigger_data *enable_data = data->private_data;
>  
> -	trace_event_put_ref(enable_data->file->event_call);
> +	/* The file may already be freed here, only the call is kept alive */
> +	trace_event_put_ref(enable_data->call);

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but it is a preexisting issue in
the subsystem's module unload handling.

When a privileged user registers a trace event trigger (like traceon or
enable_event) on a trace event defined in a kernel module and then unloads
that module, trace_module_remove_events() removes the events and eventually
frees the trace_event_file structure synchronously:

kernel/trace/trace_events.c:remove_event_file_dir() {
...
	file->flags |= EVENT_FILE_FL_FREED;
	event_file_put(file);
...
}

kernel/trace/trace_events.c:event_file_put() {
...
	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&file->ref)) {
		/* Count should only go to zero when it is freed */
		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(file->flags & EVENT_FILE_FL_FREED)))
			return;
		kmem_cache_free(file_cachep, file);
	}
}

Does this code leak the file->triggers list and cause memory corruption?

Because remove_event_file_dir() does not wait for an RCU grace period via
tracepoint_synchronize_unregister() before freeing the file, couldn't
concurrent RCU readers executing the tracepoint probe dereference the freed
file pointer?

Also, without cleaning up the triggers attached to file->triggers, are these
trigger structures permanently leaked?

>  	kfree(enable_data);
>  }
>

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260911155650.354844-1-aliamemis@disroot.org?part=1

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-11 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-11 15:56 [PATCH] tracing: Don't dereference trace_event_file in deferred trigger free Ali Ahmet Memiş
2026-09-11 16:24 ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260911162441.D00B81F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=aliamemis@disroot.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox