From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55C19495045; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 19:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789758157; cv=none; b=lXKM+E9SnVQK6mGVQQYfvW37yCaFErPt1/A9UqADqvrJr2o74dbjzCH2Qj32l8Ouj+FCX3GZ2PWLJfDpxPyIC8ZVlHxD9OSX8vfmoEP6MJNNmT5ms8jViMpDb8Y8KA4fJa0umrB0z9ITnUhYUDjMx0UKbL1HdwdZwk8GiDNRUgo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789758157; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QPhs5TmGzKtHWwiUSgtnIxINZyre2JVeb8UFF72povo=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=iVLJqir4tO8u2GnMhvEnZS/Cnby260vqEVfmNZbMstA1r0bkeayvZgk34fgWkvqjNEHiOM7UWxnseJ2u2TLAHwSQo7nRXRRVZaclL4tnmKzpkHp+rgNK4ZWOjzLOx0Ut2ak8M5QoUnt6Wu2TmAZgT07OH6QjxP730K+wHxzfTf8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=bo3gPwjz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="bo3gPwjz" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 727D91F0089D; Fri, 18 Sep 2026 19:02:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789758152; bh=QPhs5TmGzKtHWwiUSgtnIxINZyre2JVeb8UFF72povo=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=bo3gPwjzi81dn2ywlEhsVkXOlGYJLe4YL/1U2JE76Qxc92CBmUhMxA9NI1+6FwTCf TsPWuVLsaSJcwBz4IGNRnzwAffp1LX76BcTieanreexv94DG99u116rj5j4AzmKLtM 3I0N3EhnYN1Tvb12ZgpxEtIfR8fmaI0Royto9Duhamp6dHrZCjworqiCpwDpYCrqY5 s+Okpma8Dw100TooQybRuFiKRHmq88R2UqcnUW2GFMpieDrbVMHAv5++k9EeFSFBBY PDzxao/xDFDKcnVovf+h2n6AOsDrlaHwcp042I4SHukaxlWWieIo7mnH3YNsChIMj7 K2Is3J5UTrEHA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 9/9] landlock: Fix tracepoint contract documentation Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: =?utf-8?b?TWlja2HDq2wgU2FsYcO8bg==?= Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260918185036.608651-10-mic@digikod.net> References: <20260918185036.608651-1-mic@digikod.net> <20260918185036.608651-10-mic@digikod.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 19:02:32 +0000 Message-Id: <20260918190232.727D91F0089D@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > The tracepoint documentation claims that denial and lifecycle events > expose every input needed to reproduce a verdict. Instead document how > denial, ruleset, and domain events identify the denying policy, checked > operation and object, and reason for denial. Direct consumers to generic > tracepoints for additional operational context. >=20 > State the reconstruction limits: IDs are boot-local, rule checks have no > request ID, and exported records may be lost or cross-CPU reordered. >=20 > Also replace the incorrect BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT guidance with libbpf > SEC("tp_btf/...") attachment and refer consumers to the event prototypes > for callback argument layouts. >=20 > Cc: G=C3=BCnther Noack > Cc: Steven Rostedt > Signed-off-by: Micka=C3=ABl Sala=C3=BCn Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260918185036.6086= 51-1-mic@digikod.net?part=3D9