From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1847543C7D0; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 09:46:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789984011; cv=none; b=tFBwi+zxvmsMQsTWF36WEup8+GMbnYMjIqVI2cweoHNkmPFDEAEDAT9cp/WnFUn6LJKi6JayST7UieqiboprdF53UHJpMV0Wb6aKGF9BBjwhWIMSWOpWlL/BHN0sZ5n9UdjSeSQdNOc3DwSDClxjxQ9l4EUhnh6OFkbS8Sqzygk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789984011; c=relaxed/simple; bh=03IgJeLfJ/CxuMUnC4riuAI6fKkmx0ZHjK+V+hViDk0=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=D3tdGkwcsAKx6GadXq2Hv7u2UiJKRKs+L9q5d/H/PYthn1oiojPIFZ+/sToIGsPkGVD6Oq3jLpN3wS23peLKF5MELN3WepEqAcSObYYan8zA2SoLONZZ980rL6iqUWXwh+Y8WsgtjnhIPk9sAcXUg8HmA5+T79JuewPb46bwSAg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=m/wgf4Hn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="m/wgf4Hn" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60AAF1F000FF; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 09:46:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789984008; bh=03IgJeLfJ/CxuMUnC4riuAI6fKkmx0ZHjK+V+hViDk0=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=m/wgf4Hn6albcuhLJnZJCgSYeiOhgzSep0VoCY8RqXn7K1oTBfiV6DAsbfbu698EE VlvKBsyFMzBh3Z/ycM95KGuFw8oOOQWgdVFAXaDxbWtQDQv1VFAxl01kRyQHSHRIqL DQ2/Mp/czxZ2wdZAjaabI8EEEHbthGRxRl4NamFsaRQJbn5KkaM06DtEeFicORe9mc 0pQeMj1cMdG9pwOoMOs6waQRg6C8cIrOhscDx0KKwZh0fuNf4bk24/hheSGUwv5Stv vAzEOAVps0UL+s6ijxHckAC50d43BRPh3ys9sIt/SlETOwvcdp43x4wYLdQzpZ5XXz +xwXI3Rvz8sIQ== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/15] mm/oom_kill: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Ye Liu" Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260921092101.89285-3-ye.liu@linux.dev> References: <20260921092101.89285-1-ye.liu@linux.dev> <20260921092101.89285-3-ye.liu@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 09:46:47 +0000 Message-Id: <20260921094648.60AAF1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Ye Liu >=20 > Replace the manual rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pairs wrapping > for_each_process()/for_each_thread() loops with for_each_process_rculock() > and for_each_thread_rculock(), which scope the RCU read lock to the > loop body via scoped_guard(rcu). >=20 > No functional change. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Ye Liu Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260921092101.8928= 5-1-ye.liu@linux.dev?part=3D2