From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D319845FFAB; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789985650; cv=none; b=m7vFF378fmwURz8hOiMBLWjpz+OxfqyZMExHau646OzX8GFEhCjFa14iYd18Qt9OwALnzrob3MqDKcnjBaLTlNdcpFMJNxUdTMVQhJqLO3CdIJh3E4D1zASh4IYVtaNsbldbYdTt3iuK8RNu6a/8iqTE8KaOfRGJ/6iyKLd02Zk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789985650; c=relaxed/simple; bh=k9CcW4oUKclJ1tGKwNqmJ76JsoBO23kjg732HxY5vCA=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=iYs6FAJ/aLfsuOdpet1zCaASuCb0g4sOZAkh4L3sZUhslgagytjr6TD9/hnHqSLhgcsMR6yQms+HNgeEB5BZmX5ZuXuipOPyRa5V31BblV/wDJRD05MuydBoylQ7fzRlekqATkyQvWJrKOPKfWceh3DJB2S+2hoQqvwrXH2q/uQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=mvj7ldFL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mvj7ldFL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 210C61F000FF; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:14:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789985649; bh=k9CcW4oUKclJ1tGKwNqmJ76JsoBO23kjg732HxY5vCA=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=mvj7ldFLwq665JxxYOUHZ2tTJ2d1nabsVo9Wa4hiI40GMvGsjvmFntJ2dXLjYxSZ7 v/emBHlr83T+sKPYECrhOFQCu1EtZoydejXR9eqwYGORz2NQ8HSSWCGMAVawUTBn+4 j9Vl5SPuf/eXaSzG0L79zQEiSvESfHZaDdhQUDDut3LXQp9F2NkBTMefT3tD+KwrZD zwZJPFR0z8rcVsrg90hqQln567RVdF3frppE2qOBFpxofDbFhYGdYjupvQvzAzvm/u mVYERcUwqZYFxVVyHHemiHV9Tnew7b6aXTT/B/Ow1zkL/VznXaM+F0j5HgF07DcL1W UMW6wuTNUSjLw== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/15] locking/lockdep: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Ye Liu" Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260921092101.89285-9-ye.liu@linux.dev> References: <20260921092101.89285-1-ye.liu@linux.dev> <20260921092101.89285-9-ye.liu@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:14:08 +0000 Message-Id: <20260921101409.210C61F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Ye Liu >=20 > Replace the manual rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pair combined > with for_each_process_thread() loop in kernel/locking/lockdep.c with > for_each_process_thread_rculock(), which scopes the RCU read lock > to the loop body via scoped_guard(rcu). >=20 > No functional change. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Ye Liu Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260921092101.8928= 5-1-ye.liu@linux.dev?part=3D8