From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9577576EAA; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 17:21:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790097698; cv=none; b=s+ulXs3y/hxygUmdis+WFZZ4zaXBY1dsGLF/C9HscQ5ttN7KGWlGgORZgmaX9U7EbuacwDRQ4PnF8FbJF/BqGM4FDu06Bqz1O6aBchXhs0iVsLENCOL/QrbCh9YjXq6Vedf05jjUQP4CZUE56S2VBjpSCelmeyEBSOA5n0jxHTc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790097698; c=relaxed/simple; bh=K0bVgIlLnB7+MHf9lKzOC3Q8w+xEfr0U8+ovWVRrZTY=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=dE1C45g7/XcBCVxrL5bJm74UYjKI6GJqCjCqYFJ1PHj7OLyChryWh4ibS0YzZGF8LCbFKQ8Z2b8gnP5S4oiMFlK/3HIx53YKo7lijkTb7d/btC3l7vQcNvj4+wqjTw3V/+wvVOM4yH13/0qf0Crn7gXBTbQnddOrLWUX7O7iPOQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Pg3nv905; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Pg3nv905" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4775C1F000FF; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 17:21:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790097697; bh=K0bVgIlLnB7+MHf9lKzOC3Q8w+xEfr0U8+ovWVRrZTY=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=Pg3nv905QJaaVFh4M7hIX7VFLceYBmLZCuGqi9XSKcfdCdr9TG8ARsJiYHBXxC+OK qkhO29caG/loQlxntbHm0hXT1ucbV5OeupvnskLvdPcr7IxZOpNsaBtCfhTVmOhF4d 0tRxAy+4iiQb0jzcC+7RAeLCUU8DTEBMYO0pJO0Kbt6ROHhNCdOdLhU5ANhjrVPbr4 +dE7DzuAgsxGIXcGX1ZaJw3dj5VpxOzxLplHoWX7LXAOkYUjGImQIPy6zEG77C9sD2 R6N7WEyCN41hv1U2G4bs6B2Wv7qpYskj4yHKlpG1tKVqUARAAwLJ5Z6reisjX3Pjjw pL9pVLd1EeO6w== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] mm: rename pointers to software PTE values as ptentp Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Muhammad Usama Anjum" Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, damon@lists.linux.dev, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260922-pte0-v3-2-5670b8cb9059@arm.com> References: <20260922-pte0-v3-0-5670b8cb9059@arm.com> <20260922-pte0-v3-2-5670b8cb9059@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 17:21:36 +0000 Message-Id: <20260922172137.4775C1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Some interfaces use pte_t * for a software PTE value rather than for an > entry stored in a PTE table. These pointers must remain pte_t * when > pointers to PTE table storage are converted to hw_pte_t *. >=20 > Rename these parameters in the install_pte callback, > write_protect_page(), and guard_install_set_pte() to ptentp. The later > Coccinelle conversion skips pointers named ptentp, allowing it to convert > the remaining PTE table pointers without changing these interfaces. >=20 > Some functions already use ptentp for such pointers, including: > - madvise_folio_pte_batch() > - folio_pte_batch_flags() > No need to rename them. >=20 > This patch only renames parameters and makes no functional change. >=20 > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) > Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260922-pte0-v3-0-= 5670b8cb9059@arm.com?part=3D2