From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] tracing: add __print_sym() to replace __print_symbolic()
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 11:10:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923111017.F17CD1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922110955.363677-7-johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] tracing: show_print_fmt() string parsing breaks if value contains ternary operator
--
commit deeb2ac9d2766875d27bd9a2d5d898875d56cc2a
Author: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
tracing: add __print_sym() to replace __print_symbolic()
This commit introduces __print_sym() to replace the old __print_symbolic(),
making it more memory efficient and allowing dynamic updates. It relies on a
single dynamic list of items processed at the time userspace reads the
print_fmt, avoiding init-time fixups.
> diff --git a/include/trace/stages/stage7_class_define.h b/include/trace/stages/stage7_class_define.h
> --- a/include/trace/stages/stage7_class_define.h
> +++ b/include/trace/stages/stage7_class_define.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@
> #define __event_in_softirq() (REC->common_flags & 0x10)
> #define __event_in_irq() (REC->common_flags & 0x18)
>
> +#undef __print_sym
> +#define __print_sym(value, symbol_id) __print_sym(value:symbol_id)
[Severity: Medium]
Does this delimiter choice in the __print_sym() macro in
include/trace/stages/stage7_class_define.h cause issues for arbitrary C
expressions?
This macro transforms the arguments into a string format using a delimiter (:)
that is unsafe for arbitrary C expressions if parsed left-to-right. If a
kernel developer uses an expression containing a colon (such as a ternary
operator like a ? b : c) as the value argument, it seems the string
representation will contain multiple colons.
> +
> /*
> * The below is not executed in the kernel. It is only what is
> * displayed in the print format for userspace to parse.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> @@ -2109,6 +2109,102 @@ static void *f_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
[ ... ]
> +static void show_print_fmt(struct seq_file *m, struct trace_event_call *call)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + if (in_print_sym && *ptr == ':') {
> + const char *name;
> +
> + ptr++;
> + name = ptr;
> + /* skip the name */
> + while (*ptr && *ptr != ')')
> + ptr++;
[Severity: Medium]
Will this parser in show_print_fmt() in kernel/trace/trace_events.c break
if the value expression contains a ternary operator?
It appears this logic naively splits at the first colon, destroying valid C
expressions like ternary operators that natively contain a colon. If a
tracepoint passes a ternary operator to __print_sym(), the parser incorrectly
assumes the first ':' encountered uniquely separates the value expression from
the symbol ID.
This would cause tracing tools to fail parsing the exported print_fmt, breaking
event decoding for userspace.
Could a backward search for ':' from the closing parenthesis safely isolate
the symbol ID?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260922110955.363677-6-johannes@sipsolutions.net?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 11:08 [PATCH v7 0/4] tracing: improve symbolic printing Johannes Berg
2026-09-22 11:08 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] tracing: add __print_sym() to replace __print_symbolic() Johannes Berg
2026-09-23 11:10 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-28 14:19 ` Johannes Berg
2026-09-22 11:08 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] tracing/timer: use __print_sym() Johannes Berg
2026-09-22 11:08 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] net: dropreason: use new __print_sym() in tracing Johannes Berg
2026-09-24 15:31 ` Ilya Maximets
2026-09-28 13:34 ` Aaron Conole
2026-09-22 11:08 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] net: drop_monitor: use drop_reason_lookup() Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260923111017.F17CD1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox