Linux Trace Kernel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	 linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
	 v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 ntfs3@lists.linux.dev,
	"Christian Brauner (Amutable)" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	 stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] eventfs: free the eventfs_inode after an rcu grace period too
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2026 23:51:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261009-work-fixes-rcu-v1-4-7446d2d335e6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009-work-fixes-rcu-v1-0-7446d2d335e6@kernel.org>

tracefs_d_revalidate() reads ->is_freed of the eventfs_inode that
dentry->d_fsdata points to, and ->d_revalidate() is called in rcu
pathwalk mode with nothing but rcu_read_lock() held. The dentry itself
stays around for such a walker, but tracefs_d_release() drops its
reference to the eventfs_inode when the dentry is killed, and
release_ei() then frees it after a grace period of eventfs_srcu. An
SRCU grace period doesn't wait for rcu_read_lock() sections, so the
walker can read an eventfs_inode that is already gone.

With a pathwalk held up in tracefs_d_revalidate() while the dentry goes
away:

  BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in tracefs_d_revalidate+0x76/0x90
  Read of size 1 at addr ff1100010152d8d0 by task walker/97
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   tracefs_d_revalidate+0x76/0x90
   lookup_fast+0x320/0x640
   path_lookupat+0x160/0xb00
   filename_lookup+0x1f1/0x5b0
   vfs_statx+0xd7/0x3b0
   vfs_fstatat+0x4d/0x90
   __do_sys_newfstatat+0xa0/0x100
   do_syscall_64+0x10e/0x5e0
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
  [...]
  Allocated by task 1:
   __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x249/0x560
   eventfs_create_dir+0x7a/0x590
   event_create_dir+0x2fb/0xcf0
   trace_add_event_call+0xbf/0x150
  [...]
  Freed by task 11:
   kfree+0x1db/0x5b0
   srcu_invoke_callbacks+0x3a3/0x620
   process_one_work+0x937/0x1810
   worker_thread+0x4f1/0xd60

Before commit 8e556432477e ("eventfs: Use SRCU for freeing
eventfs_inodes") release_ei() used call_rcu(), which covered the walker,
while eventfs_iterate() needs the SRCU grace period. Wait for both and
chain call_rcu() from the SRCU callback.

Fixes: 8e556432477e ("eventfs: Use SRCU for freeing eventfs_inodes")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
---
Reproducer: delay.c holds a task named walker in tracefs_d_revalidate()
in rcu pathwalk mode for two seconds and repro.c frees the eventfs_inode
of its dentry meanwhile. The keep event keeps the rcuwalk directory
around.

    echo 'p:rcuwalk/keep do_sys_openat2' >> /sys/kernel/tracing/kprobe_events
    echo 'p:rcuwalk/ev do_sys_openat2' >> /sys/kernel/tracing/kprobe_events
    insmod delay.ko
    ./repro

Without this patch that gives the splat above, with it it runs clean.

delay.c:

    #include <linux/delay.h>
    #include <linux/kprobes.h>
    #include <linux/module.h>
    #include <linux/namei.h>

    /* keep a task named "walker" in tracefs_d_revalidate() in rcu pathwalk */
    static int pre(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
    {
    	if ((regs_get_kernel_argument(regs, 3) & LOOKUP_RCU) &&
    	    !strcmp(current->comm, "walker"))
    		mdelay(2000);
    	return 0;
    }

    static struct kprobe kp = {
    	.symbol_name	= "tracefs_d_revalidate",
    	.pre_handler	= pre,
    };

    static int __init delay_init(void)
    {
    	return register_kprobe(&kp);
    }

    static void __exit delay_exit(void)
    {
    	unregister_kprobe(&kp);
    }

    module_init(delay_init);
    module_exit(delay_exit);
    MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

repro.c:

    #define _GNU_SOURCE
    #include <fcntl.h>
    #include <pthread.h>
    #include <sched.h>
    #include <sys/prctl.h>
    #include <sys/stat.h>
    #include <unistd.h>

    static void pin(int cpu)
    {
    	cpu_set_t set;

    	CPU_ZERO(&set);
    	CPU_SET(cpu, &set);
    	sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(set), &set);
    }

    static void *walker(void *arg)
    {
    	struct stat st;

    	pin(1);
    	prctl(PR_SET_NAME, "walker");
    	stat("ev", &st);
    	return NULL;
    }

    int main(void)
    {
    	struct stat st;
    	pthread_t t;
    	int fd;

    	pin(0);
    	chdir("/sys/kernel/tracing/events/rcuwalk");
    	stat("ev", &st);
    	/* sets ->is_freed, the dentry stays hashed and holds the ei */
    	fd = open("/sys/kernel/tracing/kprobe_events", O_WRONLY | O_APPEND);
    	write(fd, "-:rcuwalk/ev\n", 13);
    	close(fd);
    	pthread_create(&t, NULL, walker, NULL);
    	sleep(1);
    	/* ->d_revalidate() says 0, the dentry is killed and drops the ei */
    	stat("ev", &st);
    	pthread_join(t, NULL);
    	return 0;
    }
---
 fs/tracefs/event_inode.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c b/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
index 6e3513b13cfa..090aca946717 100644
--- a/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
+++ b/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
@@ -91,6 +91,14 @@ static void free_ei_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
 	}
 }
 
+/* read under eventfs_srcu and, by tracefs_d_revalidate(), in rcu pathwalk */
+static void free_ei_srcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
+{
+	struct eventfs_inode *ei = container_of(rcu, struct eventfs_inode, rcu);
+
+	call_rcu(&ei->rcu, free_ei_rcu);
+}
+
 /*
  * eventfs_inode reference count management.
  *
@@ -112,7 +120,7 @@ static void release_ei(struct kref *ref)
 			entry->release(entry->name, ei->data);
 	}
 
-	call_srcu(&eventfs_srcu, &ei->rcu, free_ei_rcu);
+	call_srcu(&eventfs_srcu, &ei->rcu, free_ei_srcu);
 }
 
 static inline void put_ei(struct eventfs_inode *ei)

-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-09 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-09 21:51 [PATCH 0/8] fs: fix a range of UAFs during rcu pathwalk caused by non-rcu frees Christian Brauner
2026-10-09 21:51 ` [PATCH 1/8] ext4: free the sbi after a grace period Christian Brauner
2026-10-09 22:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 21:51 ` [PATCH 2/8] afs: free the super info " Christian Brauner
2026-10-09 22:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-10 12:54     ` Christian Brauner
2026-10-09 21:51 ` [PATCH 3/8] 9p: free the session " Christian Brauner
2026-10-09 22:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 21:51 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2026-10-09 21:58   ` [PATCH 4/8] eventfs: free the eventfs_inode after an rcu grace period too sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 21:51 ` [PATCH 5/8] ipc: drop the mqueue mount with kern_unmount() on setup failure Christian Brauner
2026-10-09 22:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 21:51 ` [PATCH 6/8] unicode: free the map after a grace period Christian Brauner
2026-10-09 22:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 21:51 ` [PATCH 7/8] ntfs3: free the sbi " Christian Brauner
2026-10-09 22:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 21:51 ` [PATCH 8/8] ntfs3: free replaced mount options " Christian Brauner
2026-10-09 22:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-10 12:55     ` Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:36 ` [PATCH 0/8] fs: fix a range of UAFs during rcu pathwalk caused by non-rcu frees Jan Kara
2026-10-12 10:42   ` Christian Brauner
2026-10-13 10:47     ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261009-work-fixes-rcu-v1-4-7446d2d335e6@kernel.org \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ntfs3@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox