Re: [PATCH v6] riscv: mm: Trace TLB flush requests

[Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>]

On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 13:14:59 +0200
Roman 'Hedin' Storozhenko <romeusmeister@gmail.com> wrote:

>  arch/riscv/include/asm/riscv_tlb.h | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c           |  45 ++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/riscv_tlb.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/riscv_tlb.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4d5f48112941
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/riscv_tlb.h

Normal convention would be to have "trace" in the name. riscv_trace.h ?

As riscv_tlb.h looks to be specific about tlb and not tracing.

-- Steve


> @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
> +#define TRACE_SYSTEM riscv_tlb
> +
> +#if !defined(_TRACE_RISCV_TLB_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
> +#define _TRACE_RISCV_TLB_H
> +
> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
> +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> +#include <linux/perf_event.h>
> +
> +#ifndef _TRACE_RISCV_TLB_ENUMS
> +#define _TRACE_RISCV_TLB_ENUMS
> +
> +enum riscv_tlb_flush_scope {
> +	RISCV_TLB_FLUSH_SCOPE_SINGLE,
> +	RISCV_TLB_FLUSH_SCOPE_RANGE,
> +	RISCV_TLB_FLUSH_SCOPE_ADDRESS_SPACE,
> +	RISCV_TLB_FLUSH_SCOPE_ALL,
> +};
> +
> +#endif /* _TRACE_RISCV_TLB_ENUMS */
> +
> +TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(RISCV_TLB_FLUSH_SCOPE_SINGLE);
> +TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(RISCV_TLB_FLUSH_SCOPE_RANGE);
> +TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(RISCV_TLB_FLUSH_SCOPE_ADDRESS_SPACE);
> +TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(RISCV_TLB_FLUSH_SCOPE_ALL);
> +
> +#define show_riscv_tlb_flush_scope(scope) \
> +	__print_symbolic(scope, \
> +		{ RISCV_TLB_FLUSH_SCOPE_SINGLE,        "single" }, \
> +		{ RISCV_TLB_FLUSH_SCOPE_RANGE,         "range" }, \
> +		{ RISCV_TLB_FLUSH_SCOPE_ADDRESS_SPACE, "address-space" }, \
> +		{ RISCV_TLB_FLUSH_SCOPE_ALL,           "all" })
> +
> +/*
> + * Record the invalidation request received by the RISC-V architecture code
> + *
> + * The target CPU mask represents the CPUs Linux intends to cover for the
> + * request. It can be correlated with per-CPU activity, but does not describe
> + * which harts ultimately performed an invalidation.
> + *
> + * The ASID is hardware-visible and may be reused. It must not be treated as a
> + * persistent identifier for an mm.
> + *
> + * The stride describes the invalidation granularity supplied to the RISC-V
> + * implementation.
> + *
> + * The event records the invalidation request before it is dispatched. It does
> + * not describe the mechanism used to execute the request.
> + *
> + */
> +TRACE_EVENT(riscv_tlb_flush_request,
> +	    TP_PROTO(unsigned long start, unsigned long size,
> +		     unsigned long stride, unsigned long asid, bool has_mm,
> +		     const struct cpumask *cmask,
> +		     enum riscv_tlb_flush_scope scope),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(start, size, stride, asid, has_mm, cmask, scope),
> +
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(__field(unsigned long, start)
> +		__field(unsigned long, size)
> +		__field(unsigned long, stride)
> +		__field(unsigned long, asid)
> +		__field(bool, has_mm)
> +		__field(unsigned int, target_mask_weight)
> +		__cpumask(target_cpus)
> +		__field(u32, scope)
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_fast_assign(__entry->start = start;
> +		__entry->size = size;
> +		__entry->stride = stride;
> +		__entry->asid = asid;
> +		__entry->has_mm = has_mm;
> +		__assign_cpumask(target_cpus, cpumask_bits(cmask));
> +		__entry->target_mask_weight = cpumask_weight((const struct cpumask *)
> +						     __get_cpumask(target_cpus));
> +		__entry->scope = scope;
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_printk("start=%#lx size=%#lx stride=%#lx asid=%#lx has_mm=%d target_mask_weight=%u target_cpus=%s scope=%s",
> +		  __entry->start, __entry->size, __entry->stride,
> +		  __entry->asid, __entry->has_mm,
> +		  __entry->target_mask_weight, __get_cpumask(target_cpus),
> +		  show_riscv_tlb_flush_scope(__entry->scope))
> +);
> +