From: Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mhiramat@kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com,
dust.li@linux.alibaba.com, alibuda@linux.alibaba.com,
guwen@linux.alibaba.com, hengqi@linux.alibaba.com,
shung-hsi.yu@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: implement map_update_elem to init relay file
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 21:19:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2660804b-c2a0-45cd-aac3-47824d7f0afd@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cb325603-4bf4-57cf-ca63-aa12580646fc@huaweicloud.com>
On 2023/12/23 19:28, Hou Tao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/22/2023 8:21 PM, Philo Lu wrote:
>> map_update_elem is used to create relay files and bind them with the
>> relay channel, which is created with BPF_MAP_CREATE. This allows users
>> to set a custom directory name. It must be used with key=NULL and
>> flag=0.
>>
>> Here is an example:
>> ```
>> struct {
>> __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_RELAY);
>> __uint(max_entries, 4096);
>> } my_relay SEC(".maps");
>> ...
>> char dir_name[] = "relay_test";
>> bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, NULL, dir_name, 0);
>> ```
>>
>> Then, directory `/sys/kerenl/debug/relay_test` will be created, which
>> includes files of my_relay0...my_relay[#cpu]. Each represents a per-cpu
>> buffer with size 8 * 4096 B (there are 8 subbufs by default, each with
>> size 4096B).
>
> It is a little weird. Because the name of the relay file is
> $debug_fs_root/$value_name/${map_name}xxx. Could we update it to
> $debug_fs_root/$map_name/$value_name/xxx instead ?
I think a unique directory is enough for a relay map, so currently users
can use map_update_elem to set the directory name. Thus
$map_name/${value_name}xxx may be better than $map_name/$value_name/xxx.
As for whether map_name or value_name is better to be used as the
directory name, I think it more likely that different bpf programs share
a same map_name. So value_name is currently used.
>> Signed-off-by: Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/bpf/relaymap.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/relaymap.c b/kernel/bpf/relaymap.c
>> index d0adc7f67758..588c8de0a4bd 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/relaymap.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/relaymap.c
>> @@ -117,7 +117,37 @@ static void *relay_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
>> static long relay_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
>> u64 flags)
>> {
>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + struct bpf_relay_map *rmap;
>> + struct dentry *parent;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(flags))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(key))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + rmap = container_of(map, struct bpf_relay_map, map);
>> +
>
> Lock is needed here, because .map_update_elem can be invoked concurrently.
Got it. I will fix it in the next version.
Thanks.
>> + /* The directory already exists */
>> + if (rmap->relay_chan->has_base_filename)
>> + return -EEXIST;
>> +
>> + /* Setup relay files. Note that the directory name passed as value should
>> + * not be longer than map->value_size, including the '\0' at the end.
>> + */
>> + ((char *)value)[map->value_size - 1] = '\0';
>> + parent = debugfs_create_dir(value, NULL);
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(parent))
>> + return PTR_ERR(parent);
>> +
>> + err = relay_late_setup_files(rmap->relay_chan, map->name, parent);
>> + if (err) {
>> + debugfs_remove_recursive(parent);
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> static long relay_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-23 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-22 12:21 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: introduce BPF_MAP_TYPE_RELAY Philo Lu
2023-12-22 12:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: implement relay map basis Philo Lu
2023-12-22 14:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-12-23 2:54 ` Philo Lu
2023-12-22 23:07 ` kernel test robot
2023-12-23 0:11 ` kernel test robot
2023-12-23 11:22 ` Hou Tao
2023-12-23 13:02 ` Philo Lu
2023-12-25 11:36 ` Philo Lu
2023-12-25 13:06 ` Hou Tao
2023-12-22 12:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: implement map_update_elem to init relay file Philo Lu
2023-12-22 14:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-12-23 2:55 ` Philo Lu
2023-12-23 11:28 ` Hou Tao
2023-12-23 13:19 ` Philo Lu [this message]
2023-12-22 12:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpf: introduce bpf_relay_output helper Philo Lu
2023-12-22 14:46 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-12-23 2:56 ` Philo Lu
2023-12-22 14:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: introduce BPF_MAP_TYPE_RELAY Jiri Olsa
2023-12-23 2:57 ` Philo Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2660804b-c2a0-45cd-aac3-47824d7f0afd@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=lulie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hengqi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=houtao@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=shung-hsi.yu@suse.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox