Linux Trace Kernel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/13] verification/rvgen: Delete __parse_constraint()
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:13:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b19681b46b6bb5b64f1686c1ffa642a7bcef2a0.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ik69evgy.fsf@yellow.woof>

On Mon, 2026-07-20 at 13:44 +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> Hi Gabriele,
> 
> Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com> writes:
> > The series looks ready for inclusion to me, thanks!
> 
> For patches that you have applied, can you push them to your tree? I
> think that is
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gmonaco/linux.git/ ?
> 
> I would like to have a base for my other patches, to identify conflicts.

Right good point, this is the branch I'm going to use to to send a pull request
to Steve:

https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gmonaco/linux.git/commit/?h=for-steve

> It is also useful to include them in linux-next to get some more
> testing.

I don't have direct access to linux-next and I was planning to wait for my
testing series to avoid sending Steve 2 pull requests in about a week. Unless
there's something terribly wrong in that series, I think it's not going to take
too long until they all land on next.

What do you think?

Gabriele


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-20 12:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-19  5:52 [PATCH v4 00/13] rv: Convert rvgen to Lark Nam Cao
2026-06-19  5:52 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] verification/rvgen: Switch LTL parser " Nam Cao
2026-06-19  5:52 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] verification/rvgen: Introduce a parse tree for automata using Lark Nam Cao
2026-06-19  5:52 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] verification/rvgen: Implement state and transition parser based on Lark Nam Cao
2026-06-19  5:52 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] verification/rvgen: Convert __fill_verify_invariants_func() to Lark Nam Cao
2026-06-19  5:52 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] verification/rvgen: Convert __fill_setup_invariants_func() " Nam Cao
2026-06-19  5:52 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] verification/rvgen: Convert __fill_verify_guards_func() " Nam Cao
2026-06-19  5:52 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] rv: Simplify hybrid automata monitors's clock variables Nam Cao
2026-06-19  5:52 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] verification/rvgen: Simplify the generation for " Nam Cao
2026-06-19  5:52 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] verification/rvgen: Delete __parse_constraint() Nam Cao
2026-06-25  8:21   ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-07-20 11:44     ` Nam Cao
2026-07-20 12:13       ` Gabriele Monaco [this message]
2026-07-21 14:12         ` Nam Cao
2026-06-19  5:52 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] verification/rvgen: Switch __get_event_variables() to Lark Nam Cao
2026-06-19  5:52 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] verification/rvgen: Switch __create_matrix() " Nam Cao
2026-06-19  5:52 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] verification/rvgen: Remove the old state variables Nam Cao
2026-06-19  5:52 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] verification/rvgen: Remove dead code Nam Cao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2b19681b46b6bb5b64f1686c1ffa642a7bcef2a0.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=gmonaco@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=wander@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox