From: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rv: Convert to use lock guard
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2025 07:41:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <534ed046d7417c60711063d86cf8b594fcf573ec.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251201205132.520eb490@gandalf.local.home>
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 20:38:16 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> It's best to always use your latest branch that you did your last pull on
> during a release cycle.
>
> I see you based these changes on v6.18-rc7, but your previous pull was
> based on v6.18-rc5. If I were to pull this in, it gets a bit spaghetti like
> in the merges.
>
> v6.18-rc5 -> pull1
> merge <- v6.18-rc7 <- pull2
>
> Where now we have changes between rc5 and rc7. Was there a reason you
> based on top of rc7 and not use your last pull?
>
> It's fine sending urgent patches this way, as these tags are in Linus's
> tree and it's just new changes being added. But for a subsytem tree, it's
> best not to pull in Linus's tree unless there's a good reason to do that.
Yeah got it, there was no valid reason for that rebase, I'm going to keep it
stable next time or write it explicitly otherwise.
> What I can do is simply pull the patches on top of your last patch
> directly, and keep the history clean for my pull request to Linus.
I'm pushed the tag rebased on -rc5 (actually on the last PR) just in case it
makes your life easier:
The following changes since commit 69d8895cb9a9f6450374577af8584c2e21cb5a9f:
rv: Add explicit lockdep context for reactors (2025-11-11 13:18:56 +0100)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gmonaco/linux.git rv-6.19-next-2-rc5
for you to fetch changes up to b30f635bb6492f02f2f704b46d898679371015cb:
rv: Convert to use __free (2025-12-02 07:28:32 +0100)
Thanks,
Gabriele
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-02 6:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-17 9:06 [PATCH v2 0/2] rv: Tidy up with auto-cleanup Nam Cao
2025-11-17 9:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rv: Convert to use lock guard Nam Cao
2025-11-25 19:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-11-26 7:27 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-11-26 8:36 ` Nam Cao
2025-11-26 9:33 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-11-26 15:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-11-26 14:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-11-26 15:22 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-12-01 15:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-12-01 15:28 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-12-02 1:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-12-02 1:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-12-02 6:41 ` Gabriele Monaco [this message]
2025-12-01 15:28 ` Nam Cao
2025-11-17 9:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] rv: Convert to use __free Nam Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=534ed046d7417c60711063d86cf8b594fcf573ec.camel@redhat.com \
--to=gmonaco@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).