From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout.efficios.com (smtpout.efficios.com [167.114.26.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2A31D29E; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 01:36:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=167.114.26.122 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728005773; cv=none; b=hoS+a4oRF1gf7QqqQ6JXnagb+9Ps/r8lgXLIV4qS8cE/cq4I6nVBePh4dG2kNj5rB1l/ZqWp6aaK57pve/Y+nKZgtkE8Ib7RCkFlj9KxQk57WBnVjTCFf8k59JjvGvXDcUptMK975+5GCveI/SzvFbSA63xTPn5OqTdfhbicyfQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728005773; c=relaxed/simple; bh=a/aPymda4W16ux4IAgQFTKgKS+k2ZBZVZpG58sBbX3o=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=uV480I2fokB5wrx57sQ0paNyrk8ETQY6braaie85BYNVAr+/0ojdMKvFPxvBgnKrNPlOmjfw08uk+S1PkPA71rAMKnf18RWjD3BfQ8MV59eBLvTXA16NVdjxAiJheQNODEMoG7UCx7aD855rYiMtRIaucrTq2mTXe/OC6LXUJDc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=efficios.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=efficios.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=efficios.com header.i=@efficios.com header.b=ht5UvNmu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=167.114.26.122 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=efficios.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=efficios.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=efficios.com header.i=@efficios.com header.b="ht5UvNmu" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=efficios.com; s=smtpout1; t=1728005770; bh=a/aPymda4W16ux4IAgQFTKgKS+k2ZBZVZpG58sBbX3o=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=ht5UvNmuWkSbel9GpM5PTnZ1574PNVLSEmXbBOuIQPVC5PPs6LLSumUvuOuMnB5qf ASvn3zH0Clr4MFFHvcCm6G2tJCNqRQeZDxxa4O05E2cYXbT9s3iMNs9T/uJnaaPtgt AkpVOYdUrLtP8Meh+6OLgFJ5pGW6mQqnvqhOseSZlIswfwY3iRssS6caUix+jTAsab Iv9PR+kZWiwM7AxRAiFA+4u8R77PAhZqpqOpy0bLTDYyiwKvRXJ2P14Y7a2u3DeoAi dmBbiCi8GdzecIW70crYt5/9gBUcsYfgfqNvAoaaWWo5qZhmhP3easpqSgH8MM2k+X STLxF1ZKFrHYQ== Received: from [IPV6:2606:6d00:100:4000:cacb:9855:de1f:ded2] (unknown [IPv6:2606:6d00:100:4000:cacb:9855:de1f:ded2]) by smtpout.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4XKWNB4PcdzCCk; Thu, 3 Oct 2024 21:36:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <58ecf4b1-28af-495e-9f9e-f9fb2dc67f7e@efficios.com> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 21:34:09 -0400 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] tracing: Declare system call tracepoints with TRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Masami Hiramatsu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Alexei Starovoitov , Yonghong Song , "Paul E . McKenney" , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Namhyung Kim , Andrii Nakryiko , bpf@vger.kernel.org, Joel Fernandes , linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Jeanson References: <20241003151638.1608537-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20241003151638.1608537-2-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20241003173225.7670a4f0@gandalf.local.home> <20241003210636.497cbb61@gandalf.local.home> From: Mathieu Desnoyers Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20241003210636.497cbb61@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2024-10-04 03:06, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 20:15:25 -0400 > Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > >>> Feel free to rebase on top of this patch: >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241003173051.6b178bb3@gandalf.local.home/ >>> >> >> I will. But you realize that you could have done all this SRCU and >> rcuidle nuking on top of my own series rather than pull the rug >> under my feet and require me to re-do this series again ? > > I thought I was doing you a favor! It's removing a lot of code and would > make your code simpler. ;-) The rebase was indeed not so bad. Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. https://www.efficios.com