linux-trace-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francis Laniel <flaniel@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux trace kernel <linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next] tracing/kprobes: Add symbol counting check when module loads
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2023 14:57:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5987802.lOV4Wx5bFT@pwmachine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231101081509.605080231a2736b91331cb85@kernel.org>

Hi!

Le mercredi 1 novembre 2023, 01:15:09 EET Masami Hiramatsu a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 23:24:43 +0200
> 
> Francis Laniel <flaniel@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> > > @@ -729,17 +744,55 @@ static int count_mod_symbols(void *data, const
> > > char
> > > *name, unsigned long unused) return 0;
> > > 
> > >  }
> > > 
> > > -static unsigned int number_of_same_symbols(char *func_name)
> > > +static unsigned int number_of_same_symbols(const char *mod, const char
> > > *func_name) {
> > > 
> > >  	struct sym_count_ctx ctx = { .count = 0, .name = func_name };
> > > 
> > > -	kallsyms_on_each_match_symbol(count_symbols, func_name, &ctx.count);
> > > +	if (!mod)
> > > +		kallsyms_on_each_match_symbol(count_symbols, func_name,
> > 
> > &ctx.count);
> > 
> > > -	module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol(NULL, count_mod_symbols, &ctx);
> > > +	module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol(mod, count_mod_symbols, &ctx);
> > 
> > I may be missing something here or reviewing too quickly.
> > Wouldn't this function return count to be 0 if func_name is only part of
> > the module named mod?
> 
> No, please read below.
> 
> > Indeed, if the function is not in kernel symbol,
> > kallsyms_on_each_match_symbol() will not loop.
> > And, by giving mod to module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol(), the corresponding
> > module will be skipped, so count_mob_symbols() would not be called.
> > Hence, we would have 0 as count, which would lead to ENOENT later.
> 
> Would you mean the case func_name is on the specific module?
> If 'mod' is specified, module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol() only loops on
> symbols in the module names 'mod'.
> 
> int module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol(const char *modname,
>                                    int (*fn)(void *, const char *, unsigned
> long), void *data)
> {
>         struct module *mod;
>         unsigned int i;
>         int ret = 0;
> 
>         mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
>         list_for_each_entry(mod, &modules, list) {
>                 struct mod_kallsyms *kallsyms;
> 
>                 if (mod->state == MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED)
>                         continue;
> 
>                 if (modname && strcmp(modname, mod->name))
>                         continue;
> ...
> 
> So with above change, 'if mod is not specified, search the symbols in kernel
> and all modules. If mod is sepecified, search the symbol on the specific
> module'.
> 
> Thus, "if func_name is only part of the module named mod", the
> module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol() will count the 'func_name' in 'mod' module
> correctly.

Sorry, I looked to quickly and forgot about the return value of strcmp()...

From the code, everything seems OK!
If I have some time, I will test it and potentially come back with a "Tested-
by" tag but without any warranty.

> Thank you,
> 
> 
> Thank you,

Best regards.



  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-02 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-29  3:10 [PATCH for-next] tracing/kprobes: Add symbol counting check when module loads Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2023-10-30 13:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-10-31 16:56 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-31 21:24 ` Francis Laniel
2023-10-31 23:15   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-11-02 12:57     ` Francis Laniel [this message]
2023-11-03  3:27       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-11-10 12:31 ` Francis Laniel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5987802.lOV4Wx5bFT@pwmachine \
    --to=flaniel@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).