From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] cleanup.h: Introduce DEFINE_INACTIVE_GUARD and activate_guard
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 09:42:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <60d293cb-3863-41c8-868d-59c7468e270e@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgRefOSUy88-rcackyb4Ss3yYjuqS_TJRJwY_p7E3r0SA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2024-09-02 14:46, Linus Torvalds wrote:
[...]
> IOW, that code should just have been something like this:
>
> #define __BPF_DECLARE_TRACE(call, proto, args, tp_flags) \
> static notrace void \
> __bpf_trace_##call(void *__data, proto) \
> { \
> \
> if ((tp_flags) & TRACEPOINT_MAY_FAULT) { \
> might_fault(); \
> guard(preempt_notrace)(); \
> CONCATENATE(bpf_trace_run, ... \
> return; \
> } \
> CONCATENATE(bpf_trace_run, ... \
> }
>
> instead.
If we look at perf_trace_##call(), with the conditional guard, it looks
like the following. It is not clear to me that code duplication would
be acceptable here.
I agree with you that the conditional guard is perhaps not something we
want at this stage, but in this specific case perhaps we should go back
to goto and labels ?
One alternative is to add yet another level of macros to handle the
code duplication.
#define _DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(call, proto, args, tstruct, assign, print, tp_flags) \
static notrace void \
perf_trace_##call(void *__data, proto) \
{ \
struct trace_event_call *event_call = __data; \
struct trace_event_data_offsets_##call __maybe_unused __data_offsets;\
struct trace_event_raw_##call *entry; \
struct pt_regs *__regs; \
u64 __count = 1; \
struct task_struct *__task = NULL; \
struct hlist_head *head; \
int __entry_size; \
int __data_size; \
int rctx; \
\
DEFINE_INACTIVE_GUARD(preempt_notrace, trace_event_guard); \
\
if ((tp_flags) & TRACEPOINT_MAY_FAULT) { \
might_fault(); \
activate_guard(preempt_notrace, trace_event_guard)(); \
} \
\
__data_size = trace_event_get_offsets_##call(&__data_offsets, args); \
\
head = this_cpu_ptr(event_call->perf_events); \
if (!bpf_prog_array_valid(event_call) && \
__builtin_constant_p(!__task) && !__task && \
hlist_empty(head)) \
return; \
\
__entry_size = ALIGN(__data_size + sizeof(*entry) + sizeof(u32),\
sizeof(u64)); \
__entry_size -= sizeof(u32); \
\
entry = perf_trace_buf_alloc(__entry_size, &__regs, &rctx); \
if (!entry) \
return; \
\
perf_fetch_caller_regs(__regs); \
\
tstruct \
\
{ assign; } \
\
perf_trace_run_bpf_submit(entry, __entry_size, rctx, \
event_call, __count, __regs, \
head, __task); \
}
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-03 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-28 14:37 [PATCH v1 0/2] cleanup.h: Introduce DEFINE_INACTIVE_GUARD()/activate_guard() Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-08-28 14:37 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] cleanup.h guard: Rename DEFINE_ prefix to DECLARE_ Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-08-28 14:37 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] cleanup.h: Introduce DEFINE_INACTIVE_GUARD and activate_guard Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-09-02 15:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-09-02 18:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-09-02 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-03 13:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2024-09-03 19:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-06 22:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-09-02 18:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-02 18:14 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=60d293cb-3863-41c8-868d-59c7468e270e@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox