linux-trace-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	 linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: john.ogness@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/22] rv: Add support for LTL monitors
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:22:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <63d8320abb309ef649780af44d14b9d993bab697.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5dbd62940b252ee49777e9c4298eadd644bf6526.1744355018.git.namcao@linutronix.de>

On Fri, 2025-04-11 at 09:37 +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> While attempting to implement DA monitors for some complex
> specifications,
> deterministic automaton is found to be inappropriate as the
> specification
> language. The automaton is complicated, hard to understand, and
> error-prone.
> 
> For these cases, linear temporal logic is more suitable as the
> specification language.
> 
> Add support for linear temporal logic runtime verification monitor.
> 
> For all the details, see the documentations added by this commit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
> ---
>  Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst              |   1 +
>  .../trace/rv/linear_temporal_logic.rst        |  97 +++
>  Documentation/trace/rv/monitor_synthesis.rst  | 141 ++++-
>  include/linux/rv.h                            |  56 +-
>  include/rv/ltl_monitor.h                      | 184 ++++++
>  kernel/fork.c                                 |   5 +-
>  kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig                       |   7 +
>  kernel/trace/rv/rv_trace.h                    |  47 ++
>  tools/verification/rvgen/.gitignore           |   3 +
>  tools/verification/rvgen/Makefile             |   2 +
>  tools/verification/rvgen/__main__.py          |   3 +-
>  tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/ltl2ba.py      | 552
> ++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/ltl2k.py       | 242 ++++++++
>  .../verification/rvgen/templates/ltl2k/main.c | 102 ++++
>  .../rvgen/templates/ltl2k/trace.h             |  14 +
>  15 files changed, 1431 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/rv/linear_temporal_logic.rst
>  create mode 100644 include/rv/ltl_monitor.h
>  create mode 100644 tools/verification/rvgen/.gitignore
>  create mode 100644 tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/ltl2ba.py
>  create mode 100644 tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/ltl2k.py
>  create mode 100644 tools/verification/rvgen/templates/ltl2k/main.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/verification/rvgen/templates/ltl2k/trace.h
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst
> b/Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst
> index 8e411b76ec82..2a27f6bc9429 100644
> --- a/Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ Runtime Verification
>  
>     runtime-verification.rst
>     deterministic_automata.rst
> +   linear_temporal_logic.rst
>     monitor_synthesis.rst
>     da_monitor_instrumentation.rst
>     monitor_wip.rst
> diff --git a/Documentation/trace/rv/linear_temporal_logic.rst
> b/Documentation/trace/rv/linear_temporal_logic.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..68574370eec3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/trace/rv/linear_temporal_logic.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
> +Introduction
> +============
> +
> +Runtime verification monitor is a verification technique which
> checks that the kernel follows a
> +specification. It does so by using tracepoints to monitor the
> kernel's execution trace, and
> +verifying that the execution trace sastifies the specification.
> +
> +Initially, the specification can only be written in the form of
> deterministic automaton (DA).
> +However, while attempting to implement DA monitors for some complex
> specifications, deterministic
> +automaton is found to be inappropriate as the specification
> language. The automaton is complicated,
> +hard to understand, and error-prone.
> +
> +Thus, RV monitors based on linear temporal logic (LTL) are
> introduced. This type of monitor uses LTL
> +as specification instead of DA. For some cases, writing the
> specification as LTL is more concise and
> +intuitive.
> +
> +Documents regarding LTL are widely available on the internet, this
> document will not go into
> +details.
> +
> +Grammar
> +========
> +
> +Unlike some existing syntax, kernel's implementation of LTL is more
> verbose. This is motivated by
> +considering that the people who read the LTL specifications may not
> be well-versed in LTL.
> +
> +Grammar:
> +    ltl ::= opd | ( ltl ) | ltl binop ltl | unop ltl
> +
> +Operands (opd):
> +    true, false, user-defined names consisting of upper-case
> characters, digits, and underscore.
> +
> +Unary Operators (unop):
> +    always
> +    eventually
> +    not
> +
> +Binary Operators (binop):
> +    until
> +    and
> +    or
> +    imply
> +    equivalent
> +
> +This grammar is ambiguous: operator precedence is not defined.
> Parentheses must be used.
> +
> +Example linear temporal logic
> +=============================
> +.. code-block::
> +
> +   RAIN imply (GO_OUTSIDE imply HAVE_UMBRELLA)
> +
> +means: if it is raining, going outside means having an umbrella.
> +
> +.. code-block::
> +
> +   RAIN imply (WET until not RAIN)
> +
> +means: if it is raining, it is going to be wet until the rain stops.
> +
> +.. code-block::
> +
> +   RAIN imply eventually not RAIN
> +
> +means: if it is raining, rain will eventually stop.
> +
> +The above examples are referring to the current time instance only.
> For kernel verification, the
> +`always` operator is usually desirable, to specify that something is
> always true at the present and
> +for all future. For example::
> +
> +    always (RAIN imply eventually not RAIN)
> +
> +means: *all* rain eventually stops.
> +
> +In the above examples, `RAIN`, `GO_OUTSIDE`, `HAVE_UMBRELLA` and
> `WET` are the "atomic
> +propositions".
> +
> +Monitor synthesis
> +=================
> +
> +To synthesize an LTL into a kernel monitor, the `rvgen` tool can be
> used:
> +`tools/verification/rvgen`. The specification needs to be provided
> as a file, and it must have a
> +"RULE = LTL" assignment. For example::
> +
> +    RULE = always (ACQUIRE imply ((not KILLED and not CRASHED) until
> RELEASE))
> +
> +which says: if `ACQUIRE`, then `RELEASE` must happen before `KILLED`
> or `CRASHED`.
> +
> +The LTL can be broken down using sub-expressions. The above is
> equivalent to:
> +
> +   .. code-block::
> +
> +    RULE = always (ACQUIRE imply (ALIVE until RELEASE))
> +    ALIVE = not KILLED and not CRASHED
> +
> +From this specification, `rvgen` generates the C implementation of a
> Buchi automaton - a
> +non-deterministic state machine which checks the satisfiability of
> the LTL. See
> +Documentation/trace/rv/monitor_synthesis.rst for details on using
> `rvgen`.

You probably read a lot to write this, do you mind adding a brief
Reference section for the curious reader? Asking for a friend ;)

Something like
https://docs.kernel.org/trace/rv/deterministic_automata.html#references
would do.

Thanks,
Gabriele


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-15 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-11  7:37 [PATCH v2 00/22] RV: Linear temporal logic monitors for RT application Nam Cao
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 01/22] rv: Fix out-of-bound memory access in rv_is_container_monitor() Nam Cao
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 02/22] rv: Add #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE Nam Cao
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 03/22] rv: Let the reactors take care of buffers Nam Cao
2025-04-11  8:39   ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-15  9:32   ` Petr Mladek
2025-04-15  9:53     ` Nam Cao
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 04/22] verification/dot2k: Make it possible to invoke dot2k without installation Nam Cao
2025-04-11  9:23   ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-11 14:04     ` Nam Cao
2025-04-11 14:56       ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 05/22] verification/dot2k: Make a separate dot2k_templates/Kconfig_container Nam Cao
2025-04-11  8:54   ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 06/22] verification/dot2k: Remove __buff_to_string() Nam Cao
2025-04-11  8:53   ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 07/22] verification/dot2k: Replace is_container() hack with subparsers Nam Cao
2025-04-11  8:56   ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 08/22] rv: rename CONFIG_DA_MON_EVENTS to CONFIG_RV_MON_EVENTS Nam Cao
2025-04-11 10:37   ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 09/22] verification/dot2k: Prepare the frontend for LTL inclusion Nam Cao
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 10/22] Documentation/rv: Prepare monitor synthesis document " Nam Cao
2025-04-11  9:28   ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 11/22] verification/rvgen: Prepare the templates " Nam Cao
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 12/22] verification/rvgen: Restructure the classes to prepare " Nam Cao
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 13/22] rv: Add support for LTL monitors Nam Cao
2025-04-11 11:17   ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-11 14:15     ` Nam Cao
2025-04-15 13:22   ` Gabriele Monaco [this message]
2025-04-16  3:55     ` Nam Cao
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 14/22] rv: Add rtapp container monitor Nam Cao
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 15/22] x86/tracing: Remove redundant trace_pagefault_key Nam Cao
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 16/22] x86/tracing: Move page fault trace points to generic Nam Cao
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 17/22] arm64: mm: Add page fault trace points Nam Cao
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 18/22] riscv: " Nam Cao
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 19/22] rv: Add rtapp_pagefault monitor Nam Cao
2025-04-15 12:31   ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-15 12:38     ` Nam Cao
2025-04-15 12:47       ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 20/22] rv: Add rtapp_sleep monitor Nam Cao
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 21/22] rv: Add documentation for rtapp monitor Nam Cao
2025-04-15 13:12   ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-16  4:37     ` Nam Cao
2025-04-11  7:37 ` [PATCH v2 22/22] rv: Allow to configure the number of per-task monitor Nam Cao
2025-04-11 12:31   ` Gabriele Monaco

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=63d8320abb309ef649780af44d14b9d993bab697.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=gmonaco@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).