From: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: john.ogness@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/22] rv: Add support for LTL monitors
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:22:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <63d8320abb309ef649780af44d14b9d993bab697.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5dbd62940b252ee49777e9c4298eadd644bf6526.1744355018.git.namcao@linutronix.de>
On Fri, 2025-04-11 at 09:37 +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> While attempting to implement DA monitors for some complex
> specifications,
> deterministic automaton is found to be inappropriate as the
> specification
> language. The automaton is complicated, hard to understand, and
> error-prone.
>
> For these cases, linear temporal logic is more suitable as the
> specification language.
>
> Add support for linear temporal logic runtime verification monitor.
>
> For all the details, see the documentations added by this commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
> ---
> Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst | 1 +
> .../trace/rv/linear_temporal_logic.rst | 97 +++
> Documentation/trace/rv/monitor_synthesis.rst | 141 ++++-
> include/linux/rv.h | 56 +-
> include/rv/ltl_monitor.h | 184 ++++++
> kernel/fork.c | 5 +-
> kernel/trace/rv/Kconfig | 7 +
> kernel/trace/rv/rv_trace.h | 47 ++
> tools/verification/rvgen/.gitignore | 3 +
> tools/verification/rvgen/Makefile | 2 +
> tools/verification/rvgen/__main__.py | 3 +-
> tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/ltl2ba.py | 552
> ++++++++++++++++++
> tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/ltl2k.py | 242 ++++++++
> .../verification/rvgen/templates/ltl2k/main.c | 102 ++++
> .../rvgen/templates/ltl2k/trace.h | 14 +
> 15 files changed, 1431 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/rv/linear_temporal_logic.rst
> create mode 100644 include/rv/ltl_monitor.h
> create mode 100644 tools/verification/rvgen/.gitignore
> create mode 100644 tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/ltl2ba.py
> create mode 100644 tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/ltl2k.py
> create mode 100644 tools/verification/rvgen/templates/ltl2k/main.c
> create mode 100644 tools/verification/rvgen/templates/ltl2k/trace.h
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst
> b/Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst
> index 8e411b76ec82..2a27f6bc9429 100644
> --- a/Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/trace/rv/index.rst
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ Runtime Verification
>
> runtime-verification.rst
> deterministic_automata.rst
> + linear_temporal_logic.rst
> monitor_synthesis.rst
> da_monitor_instrumentation.rst
> monitor_wip.rst
> diff --git a/Documentation/trace/rv/linear_temporal_logic.rst
> b/Documentation/trace/rv/linear_temporal_logic.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..68574370eec3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/trace/rv/linear_temporal_logic.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
> +Introduction
> +============
> +
> +Runtime verification monitor is a verification technique which
> checks that the kernel follows a
> +specification. It does so by using tracepoints to monitor the
> kernel's execution trace, and
> +verifying that the execution trace sastifies the specification.
> +
> +Initially, the specification can only be written in the form of
> deterministic automaton (DA).
> +However, while attempting to implement DA monitors for some complex
> specifications, deterministic
> +automaton is found to be inappropriate as the specification
> language. The automaton is complicated,
> +hard to understand, and error-prone.
> +
> +Thus, RV monitors based on linear temporal logic (LTL) are
> introduced. This type of monitor uses LTL
> +as specification instead of DA. For some cases, writing the
> specification as LTL is more concise and
> +intuitive.
> +
> +Documents regarding LTL are widely available on the internet, this
> document will not go into
> +details.
> +
> +Grammar
> +========
> +
> +Unlike some existing syntax, kernel's implementation of LTL is more
> verbose. This is motivated by
> +considering that the people who read the LTL specifications may not
> be well-versed in LTL.
> +
> +Grammar:
> + ltl ::= opd | ( ltl ) | ltl binop ltl | unop ltl
> +
> +Operands (opd):
> + true, false, user-defined names consisting of upper-case
> characters, digits, and underscore.
> +
> +Unary Operators (unop):
> + always
> + eventually
> + not
> +
> +Binary Operators (binop):
> + until
> + and
> + or
> + imply
> + equivalent
> +
> +This grammar is ambiguous: operator precedence is not defined.
> Parentheses must be used.
> +
> +Example linear temporal logic
> +=============================
> +.. code-block::
> +
> + RAIN imply (GO_OUTSIDE imply HAVE_UMBRELLA)
> +
> +means: if it is raining, going outside means having an umbrella.
> +
> +.. code-block::
> +
> + RAIN imply (WET until not RAIN)
> +
> +means: if it is raining, it is going to be wet until the rain stops.
> +
> +.. code-block::
> +
> + RAIN imply eventually not RAIN
> +
> +means: if it is raining, rain will eventually stop.
> +
> +The above examples are referring to the current time instance only.
> For kernel verification, the
> +`always` operator is usually desirable, to specify that something is
> always true at the present and
> +for all future. For example::
> +
> + always (RAIN imply eventually not RAIN)
> +
> +means: *all* rain eventually stops.
> +
> +In the above examples, `RAIN`, `GO_OUTSIDE`, `HAVE_UMBRELLA` and
> `WET` are the "atomic
> +propositions".
> +
> +Monitor synthesis
> +=================
> +
> +To synthesize an LTL into a kernel monitor, the `rvgen` tool can be
> used:
> +`tools/verification/rvgen`. The specification needs to be provided
> as a file, and it must have a
> +"RULE = LTL" assignment. For example::
> +
> + RULE = always (ACQUIRE imply ((not KILLED and not CRASHED) until
> RELEASE))
> +
> +which says: if `ACQUIRE`, then `RELEASE` must happen before `KILLED`
> or `CRASHED`.
> +
> +The LTL can be broken down using sub-expressions. The above is
> equivalent to:
> +
> + .. code-block::
> +
> + RULE = always (ACQUIRE imply (ALIVE until RELEASE))
> + ALIVE = not KILLED and not CRASHED
> +
> +From this specification, `rvgen` generates the C implementation of a
> Buchi automaton - a
> +non-deterministic state machine which checks the satisfiability of
> the LTL. See
> +Documentation/trace/rv/monitor_synthesis.rst for details on using
> `rvgen`.
You probably read a lot to write this, do you mind adding a brief
Reference section for the curious reader? Asking for a friend ;)
Something like
https://docs.kernel.org/trace/rv/deterministic_automata.html#references
would do.
Thanks,
Gabriele
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-15 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-11 7:37 [PATCH v2 00/22] RV: Linear temporal logic monitors for RT application Nam Cao
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 01/22] rv: Fix out-of-bound memory access in rv_is_container_monitor() Nam Cao
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 02/22] rv: Add #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE Nam Cao
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 03/22] rv: Let the reactors take care of buffers Nam Cao
2025-04-11 8:39 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-15 9:32 ` Petr Mladek
2025-04-15 9:53 ` Nam Cao
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 04/22] verification/dot2k: Make it possible to invoke dot2k without installation Nam Cao
2025-04-11 9:23 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-11 14:04 ` Nam Cao
2025-04-11 14:56 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 05/22] verification/dot2k: Make a separate dot2k_templates/Kconfig_container Nam Cao
2025-04-11 8:54 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 06/22] verification/dot2k: Remove __buff_to_string() Nam Cao
2025-04-11 8:53 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 07/22] verification/dot2k: Replace is_container() hack with subparsers Nam Cao
2025-04-11 8:56 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 08/22] rv: rename CONFIG_DA_MON_EVENTS to CONFIG_RV_MON_EVENTS Nam Cao
2025-04-11 10:37 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 09/22] verification/dot2k: Prepare the frontend for LTL inclusion Nam Cao
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 10/22] Documentation/rv: Prepare monitor synthesis document " Nam Cao
2025-04-11 9:28 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 11/22] verification/rvgen: Prepare the templates " Nam Cao
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 12/22] verification/rvgen: Restructure the classes to prepare " Nam Cao
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 13/22] rv: Add support for LTL monitors Nam Cao
2025-04-11 11:17 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-11 14:15 ` Nam Cao
2025-04-15 13:22 ` Gabriele Monaco [this message]
2025-04-16 3:55 ` Nam Cao
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 14/22] rv: Add rtapp container monitor Nam Cao
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 15/22] x86/tracing: Remove redundant trace_pagefault_key Nam Cao
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 16/22] x86/tracing: Move page fault trace points to generic Nam Cao
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 17/22] arm64: mm: Add page fault trace points Nam Cao
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 18/22] riscv: " Nam Cao
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 19/22] rv: Add rtapp_pagefault monitor Nam Cao
2025-04-15 12:31 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-15 12:38 ` Nam Cao
2025-04-15 12:47 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 20/22] rv: Add rtapp_sleep monitor Nam Cao
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 21/22] rv: Add documentation for rtapp monitor Nam Cao
2025-04-15 13:12 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-04-16 4:37 ` Nam Cao
2025-04-11 7:37 ` [PATCH v2 22/22] rv: Allow to configure the number of per-task monitor Nam Cao
2025-04-11 12:31 ` Gabriele Monaco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=63d8320abb309ef649780af44d14b9d993bab697.camel@redhat.com \
--to=gmonaco@redhat.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).