From: Ze Gao <zegao2021@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Ze Gao <zegao@tencent.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] fprobe: make fprobe_kprobe_handler recursion free
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 11:26:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c428b9f74090b2780b67ca498c45aa5e8c38c44.1684120990.git.zegao@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1684120990.git.zegao@tencent.com>
Current implementation calls kprobe related functions before doing
ftrace recursion check in fprobe_kprobe_handler, which opens door
to kernel crash due to stack recursion if preempt_count_{add, sub}
is traceable.
Refactor the common part out of fprobe_kprobe_handler and fprobe_
handler and call ftrace recursion detection at the very beginning,
and also mark these functions notrace so that the whole fprobe_k-
probe_handler is free from recusion. And
Signed-off-by: Ze Gao <zegao@tencent.com>
---
kernel/trace/fprobe.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
index 9abb3905bc8e..ad9a36c87ad9 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
@@ -20,30 +20,22 @@ struct fprobe_rethook_node {
char data[];
};
-static void fprobe_handler(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
- struct ftrace_ops *ops, struct ftrace_regs *fregs)
+static inline notrace void __fprobe_handler(unsigned long ip, unsigned long
+ parent_ip, struct ftrace_ops *ops, struct ftrace_regs *fregs)
{
struct fprobe_rethook_node *fpr;
struct rethook_node *rh = NULL;
struct fprobe *fp;
void *entry_data = NULL;
- int bit, ret;
+ int ret;
fp = container_of(ops, struct fprobe, ops);
- if (fprobe_disabled(fp))
- return;
-
- bit = ftrace_test_recursion_trylock(ip, parent_ip);
- if (bit < 0) {
- fp->nmissed++;
- return;
- }
if (fp->exit_handler) {
rh = rethook_try_get(fp->rethook);
if (!rh) {
fp->nmissed++;
- goto out;
+ return;
}
fpr = container_of(rh, struct fprobe_rethook_node, node);
fpr->entry_ip = ip;
@@ -61,23 +53,60 @@ static void fprobe_handler(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
else
rethook_hook(rh, ftrace_get_regs(fregs), true);
}
-out:
+}
+
+static void notrace fprobe_handler(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
+ struct ftrace_ops *ops, struct ftrace_regs *fregs)
+{
+ struct fprobe *fp;
+ int bit;
+
+ fp = container_of(ops, struct fprobe, ops);
+ if (fprobe_disabled(fp))
+ return;
+
+ /* recursion detection has to go before any traceable function and
+ * all functions before this point should be marked as notrace
+ */
+ bit = ftrace_test_recursion_trylock(ip, parent_ip);
+ if (bit < 0) {
+ fp->nmissed++;
+ return;
+ }
+ __fprobe_handler(ip, parent_ip, ops, fregs);
ftrace_test_recursion_unlock(bit);
+
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(fprobe_handler);
-static void fprobe_kprobe_handler(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
+static void notrace fprobe_kprobe_handler(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
struct ftrace_ops *ops, struct ftrace_regs *fregs)
{
- struct fprobe *fp = container_of(ops, struct fprobe, ops);
+ struct fprobe *fp;
+ int bit;
+
+ fp = container_of(ops, struct fprobe, ops);
+ if (fprobe_disabled(fp))
+ return;
+
+ /* recursion detection has to go before any traceable function and
+ * all functions called before this point should be marked as notrace
+ */
+ bit = ftrace_test_recursion_trylock(ip, parent_ip);
+ if (bit < 0) {
+ fp->nmissed++;
+ return;
+ }
if (unlikely(kprobe_running())) {
fp->nmissed++;
return;
}
+
kprobe_busy_begin();
- fprobe_handler(ip, parent_ip, ops, fregs);
+ __fprobe_handler(ip, parent_ip, ops, fregs);
kprobe_busy_end();
+ ftrace_test_recursion_unlock(bit);
}
static void fprobe_exit_handler(struct rethook_node *rh, void *data,
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-15 3:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-15 3:52 [PATCH 0/4] Make fpobe + rethook immune to recursion Ze Gao
2023-05-15 3:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] rethook: use preempt_{disable, enable}_notrace in rethook_trampoline_handler Ze Gao
2023-05-16 4:25 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-05-16 5:33 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-05-15 3:26 ` Ze Gao [this message]
2023-05-16 1:25 ` [PATCH 2/4] fprobe: make fprobe_kprobe_handler recursion free Steven Rostedt
2023-05-16 3:02 ` Ze Gao
2023-05-15 3:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] fprobe: add recursion detection in fprobe_exit_handler Ze Gao
2023-05-16 4:25 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-05-15 3:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] rehook, fprobe: mark rethook related functions notrace Ze Gao
2023-05-16 4:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-05-16 7:26 ` Ze Gao
[not found] <20230515031314.7836-1-zegao@tencent.com>
2023-05-15 3:13 ` [PATCH 2/4] fprobe: make fprobe_kprobe_handler recursion free Ze Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6c428b9f74090b2780b67ca498c45aa5e8c38c44.1684120990.git.zegao@tencent.com \
--to=zegao2021@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=zegao@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).