From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: paulmck@kernel.org, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu v2] 4/5] rcu-tasks: Move RCU Tasks self-tests to core_initcall()
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2025 21:00:07 +0106 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84pljwi2w0.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a68e2e94-b4c6-4791-b581-ecbf3fee28e9@paulmck-laptop>
On 2025-02-05, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> wrote:
>> This is caused by RCU falling behind a callback-flooding kthread that
>> invokes call_rcu() in a semi-tight loop. Setting rcutree.kthread_prio=40
>> avoids the splat, but still gets the shutdown-time hang. Retrying with
>> the default rcutree.kthread_prio=2 failed to reproduce the splat, but
>> it did reproduce the shutdown-time hang.
>>
>> OK, maybe printk buffers are not being flushed? A 100-millisecond sleep
>> at the end of of rcu_torture_cleanup() got all of rcutorture's output
>> flushed, but lost the subsequent shutdown-time console traffic. The
>> pr_flush(HZ/10,1) seems more sensible, but this is private to printk().
>>
>> I would like to log the shutdown-time console traffic because RCU can
>> sometimes break things on that path.
pr_flush() was changed to private because there were no users. It would
not be a problem to make it available. Adding a pr_flush() to
rcu_torture_cleanup() would be an appropriate workaround for now (more
on this at the end).
> There is a call to kmsg_dump(KMSG_DUMP_SHUTDOWN) in kernel_power_off()
> that appears to be intended to dump out the printk() buffers,
It only dumps the buffers to the registered kmsg_dumpers. It is not
responsible for flushing console backlogs.
> but it
> does not seem to do so in kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y.
> Does there need to be a pr_flush() call prior to the call to
> migrate_to_reboot_cpu()? Or maybe even to do_kernel_power_off_prepare()
> or kernel_shutdown_prepare()?
With CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y, legacy consoles only print via a dedicated
kthread. Without a pr_flush() somewhere, there is basically no chance
that they will get backlogs flushed because noone is waitig for them.
The new console API (NBCON) provides support for "atomic consoles",
which _do_ flush by transitioning to synchronous printing during
shutdown/reboot. Unfortunately we still don't have any NBCON atomic
console implemented in the kernel. The 8250 UART will be our first
driver, most likely available in 6.15. (With the current PREEMPT_RT
patch applied, the 8250 NBCON atomic driver is used.)
Since only CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y has this issue, I am not sure if we want
to sprinkle pr_flush() calls on all sleepable shutdown/reboot paths,
although that is certainly one way to handle it. For your case, adding a
pr_flush() to rcu_torture_cleanup() and making pr_flush() non-private
would be an easy solution to avoid your problem.
John Ogness
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-05 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <43f70961-1884-42bf-b303-1d33665d99d2@paulmck-laptop>
2025-01-30 18:53 ` [PATCH rcu v2] 4/5] rcu-tasks: Move RCU Tasks self-tests to core_initcall() Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-04 10:26 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-04 11:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-04 16:34 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-04 20:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-05 14:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-05 19:54 ` John Ogness [this message]
2025-02-05 20:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-05 20:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-05 21:22 ` John Ogness
2025-02-05 21:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-05 22:20 ` John Ogness
2025-02-05 22:31 ` John Ogness
2025-02-05 23:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-06 8:28 ` John Ogness
2025-02-06 9:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-06 9:02 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-02-06 9:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-06 10:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-06 11:06 ` Petr Mladek
2025-02-06 16:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84pljwi2w0.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
--to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).