From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C667D21C9FD; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 06:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754634647; cv=none; b=FkXJQB1WrRcASBEQKBuJFmEOZuE7Ijhx89EeA40m1XBAls82qIUVvU/URJUIhWtpTlNbZg1ZNaTLo5IDzqVW1jTQvpb07MRB3l8XuJrDObJUSjhDN7sGxxbkPWXXZ8x+YsFSZHYlooqoD65DuXtXwGvZVpyyeuqwvB1pxoWqJqc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754634647; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jkiWOhEyhzo/YryVRjT+5Kz54ol26kRNo11irK2vctY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Z6gQYThrtnXSUSTBLHjKC5r/tkSoomcGS3X9t5htFfoxh5RyHBqANZLGJJy09IzPrfu+dhkW877nm4LTTqvZsA0nnciDxpAjvj7lz7JvNbZfEkJxcl7weKXRKWRsI63Emn2DB37mYktrR2YtXzNm9mOQUQb4tm5DKSEvL0iGVGI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=3Ve4do3o; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=s03B0/yH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="3Ve4do3o"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="s03B0/yH" From: Nam Cao DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1754634643; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jkiWOhEyhzo/YryVRjT+5Kz54ol26kRNo11irK2vctY=; b=3Ve4do3obONhu6h/bjEiv19h4bHIIDa2xU3UqkAGutAlLpNwFwBE85nKgCUDxzUYL8r6ln ioW/mXb++Tjp58tUHasfVa4XRAYYDEFvopB+x7hztmsFKf/0GV2/pQY/kLxRrE593ul1Sc JJnEEGesOPEB0smAzEH6T6FsC0H8G2w998+my9TFlKjlDuLu5D5IAccg1ua1Tj9/3k6WXt 1UpKIlsKo2GHoDLZBETtMNAqC8LUWfAo8i1lUBKxSspks9iEaUbWwegCb4ijWqO0kKiMFo 40DA0dlAIu/y7bXrUFXziVcSpeBWs9heNWvuPhdEiQD/Otf/1zNfyfjXN/CipA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1754634643; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jkiWOhEyhzo/YryVRjT+5Kz54ol26kRNo11irK2vctY=; b=s03B0/yHw2l1VJ+AUcjB3yw8i257TCxgx78KhJVpKw/Wf2gEEdgvmbZlADv8sx1dmLaivd CWbQAVbHavRTRaDQ== To: Gabriele Monaco Cc: Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] verification/rvgen/ltl: Support per-cpu monitor generation In-Reply-To: <0d29da11a78f8c4b67f3a590bc015ba1ff4bfcf4.camel@redhat.com> References: <6754c61d60fc161963d0625a4b647a241b363fc5.camel@redhat.com> <87o6sqpfbj.fsf@yellow.woof> <0d29da11a78f8c4b67f3a590bc015ba1ff4bfcf4.camel@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2025 08:30:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87cy96pbot.fsf@yellow.woof> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Gabriele Monaco writes: > Mind I don't say you should change the value passed to ltl_target_init > nor change your logic, I only mean /online/ isn't the right word here. > > Does this make more sense? Yes, thanks for the elaboration! Nam