From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [45.145.95.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85BEF5A7B1; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 13:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.145.95.4 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706190516; cv=none; b=ZV5/BPtlifG2m+m4KFSaxKlGdpSCIxyd850nKd5AfRoOAo9ZhxzkhIWhM4cRCFIayRYXumc6Mwl6JmkRBNO3cAIeZVBYWJNxwDzcamItpHZjqCwdabC3BSAQmOL2v2xjnvbduI7ejbT5V/OH4b1lFlFI4eNirNlo1BhDHbV1f0M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706190516; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tSkZ8dfl1rFw812ykxPPPM1f5phy5tOyipZeedPwgBA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jAdD4GzFd2DWmpH867xH+7Ww/XjfMQV4EHLjbPoJg6BNOVceRpOAx/ghpN+6HffXE24ytxfcS8jCGxHbdVuWGO02PJ/PO4NWh0gdGPdiaIKqKHMm1sO8arFwGNpi9CgWklcpWU+EcoibfYWf717ZQcjEQ3rdkePyp0WKJDZasPw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=toke.dk; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=toke.dk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=toke.dk header.i=@toke.dk header.b=oUgoM4ty; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.145.95.4 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=toke.dk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=toke.dk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=toke.dk header.i=@toke.dk header.b="oUgoM4ty" From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1706190507; bh=tSkZ8dfl1rFw812ykxPPPM1f5phy5tOyipZeedPwgBA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=oUgoM4ty0scNYphlQQTkycgj2bPHA6Ud9h+Fb/OMJs4zxeZvJH1wqTmoF7f8ebRlM Zm9w7P5jmiJq0lJ+Tm3TsgfMjSe0h707S2v7cz9LFl5NyotSDVj/6OlF7mqiS5aEUI bZtWujGpGJeY0Ez96VoshLE7vJiVFfPTcbrpVNJc9swnOEejELn4vjn/R4vjnWthWa ugRkbYyvMY4S9mGvJQkBeoUmMoTd4CL3IDlYLI0t+AAVn88DhLXtEoRP3Gmc2FSkEx tpVocBOk24RdLkoI+B2CLKHhKM1aq6//ZPfLSzZNxhmjfXUFYZrTvVLPWrem7rDkE3 98/xWeBMOmDlQ== To: Ubisectech Sirius , linux-trace-kernel , linux-kernel Cc: johannes , kvalo Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?5Zue5aSN77yaZ2VuZXJhbA==?= protection fault in ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet In-Reply-To: References: <878r4e4q69.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:48:26 +0100 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87wmrx34np.fsf@toke.dk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain "Ubisectech Sirius" writes: >>Hmm, so from eyeballing the code in question, this looks like it is >>another initialisation race along the lines of the one fixed in commit: >>8b3046abc99e ("ath9k_htc: fix NULL pointer dereference at ath9k_htc_tx_get_packet()") >>Could you please test the patch below and see if you can still reproduce >>this issue with that applied? > Hello. > I can not reproduce the issue on the Linux with the patch applied > Ubisectech Sirius Team Great, thank you for testing! I'll send a proper patch. How would you like to be credited with reporting? Just as 'Ubisectech Sirius ' ? -Toke