Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: kprobe: remove unused declaring of bpf_kprobe_override

[Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 10:18 PM Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:13:07 +0200
> Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 04:59:39PM +0800, Menglong Dong wrote:
> > > After the commit 66665ad2f102 ("tracing/kprobe: bpf: Compare instruction
> >
> > should be in Fixes: tag probably ?
>
> Yes, I'll add a Fixed tag.
>

Hello!

Should I send a v2 with the "Fixes" tag? It seems that this commit has
been pending for a while.

Thanks!
Menglong Dong

> >
> > > pointer with original one"), "bpf_kprobe_override" is not used anywhere
> > > anymore, and we can remove it now.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
> >
> > lgtm, cc-ing Masami
> >
> > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> > jirka
> >
> > > ---
> > >  include/linux/trace_events.h | 1 -
> > >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/trace_events.h b/include/linux/trace_events.h
> > > index 9df3e2973626..9435185c10ef 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/trace_events.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/trace_events.h
> > > @@ -880,7 +880,6 @@ do {                                                                    \
> > >  struct perf_event;
> > >
> > >  DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct pt_regs, perf_trace_regs);
> > > -DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_kprobe_override);
> > >
> > >  extern int  perf_trace_init(struct perf_event *event);
> > >  extern void perf_trace_destroy(struct perf_event *event);
> > > --
> > > 2.39.2
> > >
> > >
>
>
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>